5311+Week+2+Assignment-Self+Assessment

.pdf

School

Lamar University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

5311

Subject

Management

Date

Apr 29, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

10

Uploaded by MagistrateComputerFerret3148 on coursehero.com

EDLD 5311 Fundamentals Leadership – Week 2 Assignment Course Learning Objectives (CLO): 1. Demonstrate a fundamental understanding of leadership approaches and mindsets. (CLO1) 2. Identify personal professional leadership orientation and philosophy. (CLO2) 3. Analyze and synthesize leadership competencies. (CLO3) 4. Develop an initial practicum plan. (CLO4) 5. Exemplify requisite credentials and program requirements. (CLO5) Week 2: Exploring Self-Assessments Week 2 Course Learning Objectives (W2CLO): 1. Engage in self-exploration and reflection to identify personal/professional attitudes, beliefs, and assumptions regarding self, leadership, and state competencies and standards. (CLO2) 2. Analyze state leadership competencies and standards. (CLO3) 3. Exemplify requisite credentials and program requirements. (CLO5) Week 2 Learning Objectives (W2LO): 1. Identify personal and leadership strengths and weaknesses by completing self-assessments. (W2LO1) 2. Analysis of personal strengths and weaknesses regarding state standards and competencies for principals by completing self-assessments. (W2LO2) 3. Record evidence of requisite credentials for candidate and mentor. (W2LO3) Texas Principal Standards Pillar: Observation and Feedback Principal Domain and Competency Domain III: Human Capital Competency 5: The entry level principal knows how to provide feedback, coaching, and professional development to staff through evaluation and supervision, knows how to reflect on his/her own practice, and strives to grow professionally. Descriptive Statement B: Coaches and develops teachers by facilitating teacher self-assessment and goal setting, conducting conferences, giving individualized feedback, and supporting individualized professional growth opportunities. Knowledge, Skills, Mindsets (KSMs) 1 Lamar University Fall 2 2022
EDLD 5311 Fundamentals Leadership – Week 2 Assignment Knowledge: Developmental process of acquiring pedagogical skills in terms of both management and rigor, Qualities of strong reflective questions Skills: Leverage reflective questioning and low inference evidence to support the teacher in identifying the key elements of the exemplar, leverage reflective questioning to support the teacher in uncovering the highest leverage gaps in their performance Mindsets: Teachers deserve consistent feedback around their practice to fine tune their skills and improve, Feedback is most effective when it includes concrete action steps, which can be implemented within a week, Short-cycle, bite-sized feedback allows teachers to develop knowledge and skills rapidly Resources Readings: (W2LO1, W2LO2) (CLO1) o Review Week 1 Reading: Breakthrough Principals, Chapter 7 “Personal Leadership” p.227-253. Desravines, J., Aquino, J., & Fenton, B. (2016). Chapter 7 Personal leadership . Breakthrough principals: A step-by-step guide to building stronger schools. John Wiley & Sons. p.227-253, p. 312-315. o McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizons , 87 (1), 40-49. o Logan, B. (2015). Reviewing the Value of Self-Assessments: Do They Matter in the Classroom?. Research in Higher Education Journal , 29 . o Chapter 149. Commissioner’s Rules Concerning Educator Standards Subchapter BB. Administrator Standards. o Texas Principal Evaluation and Support System T-PESS. A Guide to Texas Principal Standards o TEA Principal Competencies. Lectures: (CLO2, CLO3, W2LO1, W2LO2) o Lecture 1 – Leadership Assessments o Lecture 2 – State Standards and Competencies 2 Lamar University Fall 2 2022
EDLD 5311 Fundamentals Leadership – Week 2 Assignment Week 2 Assignment Rubric: Use the rubric to guide your writing. ALL evidence must be appropriately cited in APA format. Tasks Level 1: Does not meet the minimum criteria 0 – 52 Points Level 2: Approaches minimum criteria 53 Points Level 3: Meets minimum criteria 64 Points Level 4: Meets target criteria 75 Points Part 1: 42 Points Candidate articulates depth of self-reflection regarding the results of the Self- Assessments (i.e., Keirsey, Task vs. People Profile, and Breakthrough Principal Self- Assessment with specificity and clarity. (CLO2) (CL03) (W2LO1) (W2LO2) Candidate demonstrates little or no self-reflection regarding the results of the Keirsey Assessment and reference to the assessment is incomplete. 0-9 points Candidate demonstrates superficial self- reflection regarding the results of the Keirsey Assessment and is lacking in specificity and clarity. 10 points Candidate demonstrates an emerging depth of self-reflection regarding the results of the Keirsey Assessment and may be lacking in specificity and clarity. 12 points Candidate articulates depth of self- reflection regarding the results of the Keirsey Assessment with specificity and clarity. 14 points Candidate demonstrates little or no self-reflection regarding the results of the Task vs People Profile Assessment and reference to the assessment is incomplete. 0-9 points Candidate demonstrates superficial self- reflection regarding the results of the Task vs People Profile Assessment and is lacking in specificity and clarity. 10 points Candidate demonstrates an emerging depth of self-reflection regarding the results of the Task vs People Profile Assessment and may be lacking in specificity and clarity. 12 points Candidate articulates depth of self- reflection regarding the results of the Task vs People Profile Assessment with specificity and clarity. 14 points Candidate demonstrates little or no self-reflection regarding the results of the Breakthrough Principal Self- Assessment and reference to the assessment is incomplete. 0-9 points Candidate demonstrates superficial self- reflection regarding the results of the Breakthrough Principal Self- Assessment and is lacking in specificity and clarity. 10 points Candidate demonstrates an emerging depth of self-reflection regarding the results of the Breakthrough Principal Self- Assessment and may be lacking in specificity and clarity. 12 points Candidate articulates depth of self- reflection regarding the results of the Breakthrough Principal Self- Assessment with specificity and clarity. 14 points Part 2: 28 Points Candidate demonstrates little or no self-reflection Candidate demonstrates superficial self- Candidate demonstrates an emerging depth of Candidate articulates depth of self- reflection regarding 3 Lamar University Fall 2 2022
EDLD 5311 Fundamentals Leadership – Week 2 Assignment Candidate articulates depth of self-reflection regarding the results of the TEA Principal Competencies and Texas Principal Standards Self- Assessment with specificity and clarity. (CLO2) (W2LO1) regarding the results of the TEA Principal Competencies Self- Assessment and reference to the assessment is incomplete. 0-9 points reflection regarding the results of the TEA Principal Competencies Self- Assessment and is lacking in specificity and clarity. 10 points self-reflection regarding the results of the TEA Principal Competencies Self- Assessment and may be lacking in specificity and clarity. 12 points the results of the TEA Principal Competencies Self- Assessment with specificity and clarity. 14 points Candidate demonstrates little or no self-reflection regarding the results of the Texas Principal Standards Self- Assessment and reference to the assessment is incomplete. 0-9 points Candidate demonstrates superficial self- reflection regarding the results of the Texas Principal Standards Self- Assessment and is lacking in specificity and clarity. 10 points Candidate demonstrates an emerging depth of self-reflection regarding the results of the Texas Principal Standards Self- Assessment and may be lacking in specificity and clarity. 12 points Candidate articulates depth of self- reflection regarding the results of the Texas Principal Standards Self- Assessment with specificity and clarity. 14 points Writing Quality: 5 Points Grammar, Mechanics, Spelling, Citations Narrative has glaring and unacceptable grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling errors. And/Or, published and public sources are inadequately cited or not cited at all. 0-2 points Narrative has frequent grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling errors. And/Or, most published and public sources are cited, but with many APA formatting errors. 3 points Narrative has several grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling errors. And/Or, all published and public sources are cited with several APA formatting errors. 4 points Narrative has few or no grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling errors. And, all published and public sources are properly cited with APA formatting. 5 points 4 Lamar University Fall 2 2022
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help