Auditing And Assurance Services
17th Edition
ISBN: 9780134897431
Author: ARENS, Alvin A.
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Videos
Question
Chapter 5, Problem 24DQP
To determine
Specify whether the statement should be proven as per the given acts.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Section 11(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 provides that individuals can be sued and maybe liable for investors’ losses in connection with a public securities offering under which ofthese circumstances?a. The chairman of the board of directors performed a reasonable investigation of facts inconnection with preparing the section in the registration statement concerning the specification of the use of the proceeds of the offering.b. A consulting engineer performed a reasonable investigation and reported in the registration statement on the feasibility of construction of a roadway to be financed with theoffering proceeds.c. The president of the issuing entity had no reason to doubt the report of the consultingengineer, although the president did not perform a separate reasonable investigation ofher own.d. The officers of the issuing entity were relieved that the independent auditors did notmake an issue about the excessive valuation of inventory held to support construction inprogress
Under the 1933 Securities Act, which of the following must be proven by the purchaserof the security?Reliance on the Fraud byFinancial Statements The CPA(1) Yes Yes(2) Yes No(3) No Yes(4) No No
When investors sue auditors for damages under section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933,they must allege and provea. Scienter on the part of auditors.b. The audited financial statements contained a material misstatement.c. They relied on the materially misstated financial statements.d. Their reliance on the materially misstated financial statements was the direct cause oftheir loss.
Chapter 5 Solutions
Auditing And Assurance Services
Ch. 5 - Prob. 1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 4RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5RQCh. 5 - Prob. 6RQCh. 5 - Prob. 7RQCh. 5 - Prob. 8RQCh. 5 - Prob. 9RQCh. 5 - Prob. 10RQ
Ch. 5 - What potential sanctions does the SEC have against...Ch. 5 - Prob. 12RQCh. 5 - Prob. 13RQCh. 5 - Prob. 14.1MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 14.2MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 14.3MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 15.1MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 15.2MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 15.3MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 16.1MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 16.2MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 16.3MCQCh. 5 - Prob. 17DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 18DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 19DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 20DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 21DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 22DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 23DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 24DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 27DQPCh. 5 - Prob. 28C
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- An auditor was sued and found guilty of negligence. For each of the following situations, indicate the likelihood the plaintiff would win if the plaintiff is: An investor suing under the 1934 Securities Exchange Act. An investor suing under the 1933 Securities Act.arrow_forwardWhich of the following statements regarding auditors’ liability under the Securities Act of1933 is not true?a. The act relates to the initial issuance of securities to the public, normally through an initial public offering.b. Auditors’ liability arises because of audited financial information filed with the SEC.c. Third parties must demonstrate that they relied on misstated financial statements thatwere examined by auditors.d. Auditors may be liable if they are found to have engaged in ordinary negligence.arrow_forwardIndividuals who believe they relied on misstated financial statements to make a decision andhave suffered losses as a result will issue an action known as aa. Breach of contract.b. Tort.c. Securities litigation.d. Constructive fraud.arrow_forward
- Contrast the auditor’s liability under the Securities Act of 1933 withthat under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.arrow_forwardSelect the necessary words from the list of possibilities to complete the following statements. 1. Statements The case, a landmark case of liability under the Securities Act of 1933, involved criticism of the auditors' review for subsequent events. Under the Securities Act of 1933, initial purchasers of securities may sue the auditors for misleading audited 2. financial statements and need not prove that they relied on the financial statements. The burden of proof is on the auditors to prove that they were in the performance of their work. A of financial statements involves the performance of limited investigative procedures that provide 3. a basis for the expression of limited assurance that there are no material departures from generally accepted accounting principles. 4. When damage to another is directly attributable to a wrongdoer's act, is said to exist. 5. A document including audited financial statements that must be filed with the SEC by any company intending to sell its…arrow_forwardThe following pertains to auditor legal liability standards under the PSLRA:a. The Reform Act requires that, in any private securities fraud action in which the plaintiff is alleging a misleading statement or omission on the part of the defendant, “the complaint shall specify each statement alleged to have been misleading, the reason or reasons why the statement is misleading, and, if an allegation regarding the statement or omission is made on information and belief, the complaint shall state with particularity all facts on which that belief is formed.”90Do you believe this standard better protects auditors from legal liability than the standards which existed before the PSLRA? Explain.b. Do you believe the change in standards for auditors’ liability under the PSLRA from joint-and-several to proportional liability was a good thing? Explain.arrow_forward
- The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 imposes proportionate liability on the CPA who:arrow_forwardThe Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act of 1934 containa. Civil liability provisions applicable to auditors. b. Criminal liability provisions applicable to auditors. c. Neither a nor b. d. Both a and b.arrow_forwardA CPA issued an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of a company that sold common stock in a public offering subject to the Securities Act of 1933. Based on a misstatement in the financial statements, the CPA is being sued by an investor who purchased shares of this public offering. Which of the following represents a viable defense? A) The investor has not proven CPA negligence. B) The CPA detected the misstatement after the audit report date. C) The audit work was adequate to support the CPA's opinion. D) The investor did not rely upon the financial statement.arrow_forward
- A group of investors sued Anderson, Olds, and Watershed, CPAs (AOW) for alleged damages suffered when the entity in which they held common stock went bankrupt. To avoidliability under the common law, AOW must demonstrate which of the following?a. The investors actually suffered a loss.b. The investors relied on the financial statements audited by AOW.c. The investors’ loss was a direct result of their reliance on the audited financial statements.d. The audit was conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards andwith due professional care.arrow_forwardWhat are the defenses that someone can take to charges of violations under the 1933 securities act?arrow_forwardMisrepresentation discovered by an insurer may result in the policy being voided. Which one (1) of the following circumstances must the insurer show occurred to legally void the policy? The misrepresentation was malicious. The misrepresented fact was material to the risk. The misrepresentation was the result of extreme carelessness by the insured's broker. The misrepresented fact was the product of collusion between the insured and the broker.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage Learning
Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...AccountingISBN:9781337485913Author:BROOKSPublisher:Cengage
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337619455
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Business/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...
Accounting
ISBN:9781337485913
Author:BROOKS
Publisher:Cengage
Revenue recognition explained; Author: The Finance Storyteller;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=816Q6pOaGv4;License: Standard Youtube License