Principles Of Auditing & Other Assurance Services
21st Edition
ISBN: 9781259916984
Author: WHITTINGTON, Ray, Pany, Kurt
Publisher: Mcgraw-hill Education,
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 3, Problem 38OQ
a.
To determine
Identify that the given item must be provided to the management of Company T.
b.
To determine
Identify that the given item must be provided to the management of Company T.
c.
To determine
Identify that the given item must be provided to the management of Company T.
d.
To determine
Identify that the given item must be provided to the management of Company T.
e.
To determine
Identify that the given item must be provided to the management of Company T.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The revenue agent who audited Ms. Hsui's Form 1040 discovered a $15,250 deduction that wasn't allowed by the tax law. The
improper deduction reduced Ms. Hsui's tax by $5,033. The total tax deficiency for the year under audit was $6,490.
Required:
a. Compute the maximum penalty if the agent concludes that the improper deduction was due to Ms. Hsui's negligence in preparing
the tax return.
b. Compute the maximum penalty if the agent concludes that the improper deduction represented Ms. Hsui's deliberate attempt to
cheat the government by underpaying tax.
Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below.
Required A Required B
Compute the maximum penalty if the agent concludes that the improper deduction was due to Ms. Hsui's negligence in
preparing the tax return.
Note: Round your answer to the nearest whole dollar amount.
A tax return client was audited for a prior year return and assessed a tax deficiency because a material deduction was disallowed. Nevertheless, the client insists on taking the very same kind of deduction on this year’s return...
(a) A CPA absolutely may not prepare or sign the client’s return for this year un-less it conforms to the audit result for the prior year.
(b) A CPA may prepare and sign the client’s return for this year claiming a de-duction that previously was disallowed if the CPA determines as a matter of in-dependent professional judgment that the deduction is proper.
(c) A CPA may prepare and sign the client’s return for this year claiming a de-duction that previously was disallowed if the CPA receives a formal tax opinion from a law firm or from an unaffiliated CPA affirming that it is more likely than not that the deduction would be sustained on its merits if litigated.
The revenue agent who audited Ms. Hsui's Form 1040 discovered a $15,500 deduction that wasn't allowed by the tax law. The
improper deduction reduced Ms. Hsui's tax by $5,053. The total tax deficiency for the year under audit was $6,510.
Required:
a. Compute the maximum penalty if the agent concludes that the improper deduction was due to Ms. Hsui's negligence in preparing
the tax return.
b. Compute the maximum penalty if the agent concludes that the improper deduction represented Ms. Hsui's deliberate attempt to
cheat the government by underpaying tax.
Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below.
Required A Required B
Compute the maximum penalty if the agent concludes that the improper deduction was due to Ms. Hsui's negligence in
preparing the tax return.
Note: Round your answer to the nearest whole dollar amount.
Negligence penalty s 291 Ⓡ
Required A
Required B >
Chapter 3 Solutions
Principles Of Auditing & Other Assurance Services
Ch. 3 - What is meant by the term ethical dilemma?...Ch. 3 - What are the two major types of constraints on...Ch. 3 - Prob. 3RQCh. 3 - Prob. 4RQCh. 3 - Prob. 5RQCh. 3 - Prob. 6RQCh. 3 - Prob. 7RQCh. 3 - Bill Scott works as a manager in the Phoenix...Ch. 3 - Prob. 9RQCh. 3 - Prob. 10RQ
Ch. 3 - Prob. 11RQCh. 3 - Prob. 12RQCh. 3 - Prob. 13RQCh. 3 - Prob. 14RQCh. 3 - Prob. 15RQCh. 3 - Prob. 16RQCh. 3 - Prob. 17RQCh. 3 - Prob. 18RQCh. 3 - Prob. 19RQCh. 3 - Prob. 20RQCh. 3 - Prob. 21RQCh. 3 - Prob. 22RQCh. 3 - Prob. 23RQCh. 3 - Prob. 24RQCh. 3 - Prob. 25RQCh. 3 - Prob. 26RQCh. 3 - Prob. 27QRACh. 3 - Prob. 28QRACh. 3 - Prob. 29QRACh. 3 - Prob. 30QRACh. 3 - Prob. 31QRACh. 3 - Prob. 32QRACh. 3 - Ron Barber, CPA, is auditing the financial...Ch. 3 - Prob. 34AOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34BOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34COQCh. 3 - Prob. 34DOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34EOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34FOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34GOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34HOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34IOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34JOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34KOQCh. 3 - Prob. 34LOQCh. 3 - Prob. 35OQCh. 3 - Prob. 36OQCh. 3 - Prob. 37OQCh. 3 - Prob. 38OQCh. 3 - Prob. 39OQCh. 3 - Prob. 40OQCh. 3 - Prob. 41OQCh. 3 - Prob. 42OQCh. 3 - Gary Watson, a graduating business student at a...Ch. 3 - Prob. 44PCh. 3 - Prob. 45PCh. 3 - Prob. 46PCh. 3 - Prob. 47PCh. 3 - Prob. 48PCh. 3 - Prob. 49ITCCh. 3 - Prob. 50ITCCh. 3 - Prob. 51RDC
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Sarah Keene, CPA, is the newly hired controller for Plexicon, Inc., which is a publicly traded corporation. Ms. Keene's first job with Plexicon was the review of the company's accounting practices on deferred income taxes. In doing her review, she noted differences between tax and book depreciation methods that permitted Plexicon to realize a sizable deferred tax liability on its balance sheet. As a result, Plexicon paid very little in income taxes at that time.\\n\\n Keene also discovered that Plexicon has an explicit policy of selling off plant assets before they reversed in the deferred tax liability account. This policy, coupled with the rapid expansion of its plant asset base, allowed Plexicon to "defer" all income taxes payable for several years, even though it always has reported positive earnings and an increasing EPS. Keene checked with the legal department and found the policy to be legal, but she's uncomfortable with the ethics of it.\\n\\nRequired:\\n\\nWhy would Plexicon…arrow_forwardEmerald Corporation is required to change its method of accounting for Federal income tax purposes. The change will require an adjustment to income to be made over three tax periods. Jonas, the sole shareholder of Emerald Corporation, wants to better understand the implications of this adjustment for E & P purposes, because he anticipates a distribution from Emerald in the current year. Prepare a memo for your firm’s client files describing the results of your research.arrow_forwardArthur Young & Co., a firm of certified public accountants, was the independent auditor for Amerada Hess Corporation. During its review of Amerada’s financial statements as required by Federal securities laws, Young confirmed Amerada’s statement of its contingent tax liabilities and prepared tax accrual work papers. These work papers, which pertained to Young’s evaluation of Amerada’s reserves for contingent tax liabilities, included discussions of questionable positions Amerada might have taken on its tax returns. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) initiated a criminal investigation of Amerada’s tax returns when, during a routine audit, it discovered questionable payments made by Amerada from a “special disbursement account.” The IRS summoned Young to make available all its information relating to Amerada, including the tax accrual work papers. Amerada instructed Young not to obey the summons. The IRS then brought an action against Young to enforce the administrative summons.a.…arrow_forward
- Mr. Stanhope has an MBA degree from Stanford University and has successfully operated a business for 18 years. The revenue agent who audited Mr. Stanhope's Form 1040 discovered a glaring error resulting in a $16,200 underpayment of tax. When questioned by the revenue agent about the error, Mr. Stanhope just shrugged and offered no logical explanation. Required: a. If the error resulted from Mr. Stanhope's blatant disregard of a tax rule, compute the penalty for negligence. b. Is Mr. Stanhope's level of education and business experience likely to be a factor considered by the revenue agent in determining negligence? Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Required A Required B X Answer is complete but not entirely correct. If the error resulted from Mr. Stanhope's blatant disregard of a tax rule, compute the penalty for negligence. Accuracy-related penalty $ 3,440 X Required A Required B >arrow_forwardMr. Stanhope has an MBA degree from Stanford University and has successfully operated a business for 18 years. The revenue agent who audited Mr. Stanhope's Form 1040 discovered a glaring error resulting in a $17,500 underpayment of tax. When questioned by the revenue agent about the error, Mr. Stanhope just shrugged and offered no logical explanation. Required: a. If the error resulted from Mr. Stanhope's blatant disregard of a tax rule, compute the penalty for negligence. b. Is Mr. Stanhope's level of education and business experience likely to be a factor considered by the revenue agent in determining negligence? Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Required A Required B If the error resulted from Mr. Stanhope's blatant disregard of a tax rule, compute the penalty for negligence. Accuracy-related penaltyarrow_forwardPetroleum, Inc. is in need of tax consulting services and wants to engage an accounting firm to perform these services on its behalf. The following events have occurred: On December 1, Petroleum, Inc., sent Brick, Waterhouse, & Co. (BW&C) a letter, via overnight delivery, offering to engage BW&C to review Petroleum’s tax situation for the current year for $10,000. In the letter, the company stated that BW&C had ten days to accept. On December 5, BW&C sent an e-mail message that stated, “The price for the tax analysis seems too low. We remain interested in the engagement. Would you consider paying $15,000?” Petroleum received the message without responding immediately. The next day, Smith & Taylor, a BW&C competitor, offered to conduct the tax services for $8,000. On learning of this offer, BW&C immediately e-mailed Petroleum, agreeing to do the work for $10,000. Petroleum received this message on December 7. Explain why BW&C and Petroleum do, or do…arrow_forward
- OBTUSE DULL Co. is involved in a tax dispute. OBTUSE has wrongfully paid taxes and is claiming for refund of the taxes it has previously paid. As of December 31, 20x1, OBTUSE's legal counsel was very confident that OBTUSE will be able to recover the tax refund amounting to P40M in the coming year. The entry to recognize the probable receipt of the tax refund includes Select the correct response: a debit to receivable and a credit to gain a debit to receivable none of these a debit to prepaid asset a credit to gainarrow_forwardOn October 5, 2016, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) sent KLM Corp. a Final Assessment Notice(FAN), stating that after its audit pursuant to a Letter of Authority duly issued therefor, KLM Corp. haddeficiency value-added and withholding taxes. Subsequently, a warrant of distraint and/or levy wasissued against KLM Corp. KLM Corp. opposed the actions of the BIR on the ground that it was notaccorded due process because it did not even receive a Preliminary Assessment Notice (PAN) afterthe BIR’s investigation, which the BIR admitted. a) Distinguish a PAN from a FAN.b) Are the deficiency tax assessment and warrant of distraint and/or levy issued against KLMCorp. valid? Explain.arrow_forwardDuring the audit conducted by the BIR official, it was found that the rental income claimed by the corporation was not subjected to expanded withholding tax. Accordingly, the claimed rental expense: * Is deductible from the gross income of the corporation, despite non-withholding of income taxby the corporation Is deductible, if it can be shown that the lessor has correctly reported the rental income in his tax return. Is not deductible from gross income of the corporation due to non-withholding of tax; Is deductible from the gross income of the corporation, provided that the 5% expanded withholding tax is paid by the corporation during the audit;arrow_forward
- (Deferred Taxes, Income Effects) Stephanie Delaney, CPA, is the newly hired director of corporate taxation for Acme Incorporated, which is a publicly traded corporation. Ms. Delaney’s first job with Acme was the review of the company’s accounting practices on deferred income taxes. In doing her review, she noted differences between tax and book depreciation methods that permitted Acme to realize a sizable deferred tax liability on its balance sheet. As a result, Acme paid very little in incometaxes at that time.Delaney also discovered that Acme has an explicit policy of selling off plant assets before they reversed in the deferred tax liability account. This policy, coupled with the rapid expansion of its plant asset base, allowed Acme to “defer” all income taxes payable for several years, even though it always has reported positive earnings and an increasing EPS. Delaney checked with the legal department and found the policy to be legal, but she’s uncomfortable with the ethics of…arrow_forwardDuring 2005, Tedd Co. became involved in a tax dispute with the IRS. At December 31, 2005, Tedd's tax advisor believed that an unfavorable outcome was probable. A reasonable estimate of additional taxes was $400,000 but could be as much as $600,000.After the 2005 financial statements were issued, Tedd received and accepted an IRS settlement offer of $450,000.What amount of accrued liability should Tedd have reported in its December 31, 2005 balance sheet?arrow_forwardO’Reilly Inc. considered the probability of its recent tax position taken related to the deductibility of certain expenses of $100,000. O’Reilly Inc. is more than 50% certain that its tax position supporting the deductibility of the $100,000 will hold if the company is audited by the taxing authorities. Based upon the information available, the company believes that it will have to settle with the taxing authorities for less than 100% of the $100,000 of tax deductions taken. As a result, O’Reilly Inc. recorded a liability of $10,000 in addition to income taxes payable of $280,000, which factored in $100,000 of deductions. O’Reilly Inc.’s tax rate is 25%. In the following year, O’Reilly Inc. was audited by the taxing authorities and based upon the settlement, O’Reilly recorded income tax expense of $7,500.What was the dollar amount of allowable deductions based upon the settlement?$40,000 $90,000 $30,000 $70,000 $60,000 None of the abovearrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College Pub
Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305080577
Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg
Publisher:South-Western College Pub