In Exercises 11 − 20 , use a truth table to determine the validity of the argument specified. If the argument is invalid, interpret the specific circumstances that cause it to be invalid. the argument in Exercise 9 9 . p : It is a monkey . q : It is an ape . r : It is King Kong . } U s e t h e s e s y m b o l s . 1. Being a monkey is sufficient for being an ape. 2. King Kong is an ape. Therefore, King Kong is not a monkey.
In Exercises 11 − 20 , use a truth table to determine the validity of the argument specified. If the argument is invalid, interpret the specific circumstances that cause it to be invalid. the argument in Exercise 9 9 . p : It is a monkey . q : It is an ape . r : It is King Kong . } U s e t h e s e s y m b o l s . 1. Being a monkey is sufficient for being an ape. 2. King Kong is an ape. Therefore, King Kong is not a monkey.
In Exercises
11
−
20
, use a truth table to determine the validity of the argument specified. If the argument is invalid, interpret the specific circumstances that cause it to be invalid.
the argument in Exercise 9
9.
p
:
It is a monkey
.
q
:
It is an ape
.
r
:
It is King Kong
.
}
U
s
e
t
h
e
s
e
s
y
m
b
o
l
s
.
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, subject and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Grade 12 and UG/ Introduction to logical statements and truth tables; Author: Dr Trefor Bazett;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2eyZZK-OIk;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY