Essentials of Corporate Finance (Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series in Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate)
9th Edition
ISBN: 9781259277214
Author: Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Bradford D Jordan Professor
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
Chapter 12, Problem 9CTCR
Summary Introduction
To discuss: Whether the companies should proceed with their investments in natural gas wells.
Introduction:
The cost of capital refers to the return that the investors expect on a particular investment. In other words, it refers to the compensation demanded by the investors for using their capital.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
The Salad Oil Storage Company (SOS) has financed a large part of its facilities with long-term debt. There is a significant risk of default, but the company is not on the ropes yet.
a. explain why SOS stockholders could lose by investing in a positive-NPV project financed by an equity issue.
b. explain why SOS stockholders could gain by investing in a highly risky, negative-NPV project.
A firm is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are
mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO wants to use the IRR
criterion, while the CFO favors the NPV method. You were hired to advise the firm on the
best procedure, given a WACC of 15%. If the wrong decision criterion is used, how much
potential value would the firm lose?
Project
Year 0
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
S
-$995 million
$385 million
$400 million
$525 million
$650 million
L
-$2.05 billion
$705 million
$835 million
$950 million
$1.025 billion
$6.04 million
O $359.08 million
$46.04 million
$451.15 million
O $405.11 million
ND Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates other methods. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the Profitability index? Discuss your results of these methods and make a recommendation on the projects to the CEO about which one to go for and why?
Chapter 12 Solutions
Essentials of Corporate Finance (Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series in Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate)
Ch. 12.1 - What is the primary determinant of the cost of...Ch. 12.1 - What is the relationship between the required...Ch. 12.2 - Prob. 12.2ACQCh. 12.2 - Prob. 12.2BCQCh. 12.3 - Prob. 12.3ACQCh. 12.3 - Prob. 12.3BCQCh. 12.3 - Prob. 12.3CCQCh. 12.4 - Prob. 12.4ACQCh. 12.4 - Why do we multiply the cost of debt by (1 TC)...Ch. 12.4 - Under what conditions is it correct to use the...
Ch. 12.5 - Prob. 12.5ACQCh. 12.5 - Prob. 12.5BCQCh. 12.6 - Prob. 12.6ACQCh. 12.6 - Prob. 12.6BCQCh. 12 - Section 12.1What are the components used to...Ch. 12 - Prob. 12.2CCh. 12 - Prob. 12.3CCh. 12 - Prob. 12.4CCh. 12 - Section 12.5True or False: Projects should always...Ch. 12 - WACC. On the most basic level, if a firms WACC is...Ch. 12 - Prob. 2CTCRCh. 12 - Project Risk. If you can borrow all the money you...Ch. 12 - LO4 12.4WACC and Taxes. Why do we use an aftertax...Ch. 12 - DGM Cost of Equity Estimation. What are the...Ch. 12 - Prob. 6CTCRCh. 12 - Prob. 7CTCRCh. 12 - Prob. 8CTCRCh. 12 - Prob. 9CTCRCh. 12 - Prob. 10CTCRCh. 12 - Prob. 1QPCh. 12 - Calculating Cost of Equity. Halestorm Corporations...Ch. 12 - Calculating Cost of Equity. Stock in CDB...Ch. 12 - Estimating the DCF Growth Rate. Suppose Hornsby...Ch. 12 - Prob. 5QPCh. 12 - LO2 6Calculating Cost of Debt. ICU Window, Inc.,...Ch. 12 - LO2 7Calculating Cost of Debt. Jimmys Cricket Farm...Ch. 12 - Calculating Cost of Debt. For the firm in Problem...Ch. 12 - Calculating WACC. Bargeron Corporation has a...Ch. 12 - Prob. 10QPCh. 12 - Prob. 11QPCh. 12 - Book Value versus Market Value. Bonaime, Inc., has...Ch. 12 - Calculating the WACC. In Problem 12, suppose the...Ch. 12 - WACC. Clifford, Inc., has a target debtequity...Ch. 12 - Prob. 15QPCh. 12 - Finding the WACC. Hankins Corporation has 5.4...Ch. 12 - SML and WACC. An all-equity firm is considering...Ch. 12 - Calculating the WACC. You are given the following...Ch. 12 - Calculating Capital Structure Weights. Liu...Ch. 12 - Calculating the WACC. Gnomes R Us is considering a...Ch. 12 - Prob. 21QPCh. 12 - Calculating the Cost of Debt. Ying Import has...Ch. 12 - Prob. 23QPCh. 12 - Adjusted Cash Flow from Assets. Ward Corp. is...Ch. 12 - Adjusted Cash Flow from Assets. In the previous...Ch. 12 - Prob. 26QPCh. 12 - WACC and NPV. Photochronograph Corporation (PC)...Ch. 12 - Project Evaluation. This is a comprehensive...Ch. 12 - Prob. 1CCCh. 12 - Cost of Capital for Layton Motors You have...Ch. 12 - Prob. 3CCCh. 12 - Prob. 4CCCh. 12 - Prob. 5CC
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, finance and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Consider the case of another company. Kim Printing is evaluating two mutually exclusive projects. They both require a $1 million investment today and have expected NPVS of $200,000. Management conducted a full risk analysis of these two projects, and the results are shown below. Risk Measure Standard deviation of project's expected NPVS Project beta Correlation coefficient of project cash flows (relative to the firm's existing projects) Which of the following statements about these projects' risk is correct? Check all that apply. Project B has more stand-alone risk than Project A. Project A has more corporate risk than Project B. Project A $80,000 1.2 0.7 Project B has more corporate risk than Project A. Project A has more market risk than Project B. Project B $40,000 1.0 0.9arrow_forwardA firm is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO wants to use the IRR criterion, while the CFO favors the NPV method. You were hired to advise the firm on the best procedure. If the wrong decision criterion is used, how much potential value would the firm lose? WACC: 6.00% Year 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$1,025 $380 $380 $380 $380 CFL -$2,150 $765 $765 $765 $765 $198.61 $219.51 $209.07 O $188.67 $230.55arrow_forwardA firm is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO wants to use the IRR criterion, while the CFO favors the NPV method. You were hired to advise the firm on the best procedure. If the wrong decision criterion is used, how much potential value would the firm lose? The WACC = 6.75% 1 2 3 4 CFs -$1,025 $380 $380 $380 $380 CFL -$2,150 $765 $765 $765 $765arrow_forward
- Alberta Inc. is considering investing in two projects, each of which has an initial investment requirement of \(\$ 100,000 \). Both A and B are "normal" risk for the company. A has a net present value of \( \$ 25,000 \). B has a net present value of \( \$ 20,000 \). None of the answers provided \(A \) and \(B \) are equally valuable. \(A \) is better than \(B \) because it has a higher net present value and the same risk level. \(B \) is better than \(A \) because of the risk. There is insufficient information to make a rational choice between A and B.arrow_forwardA firm is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO wants to use the IRR criterion, while the CFO favors the NPV method. You were hired to advise the firm on the best procedure. If the wrong decision criterion is used, how much potential value would the firm lose? WACC: 3.00% Year 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$1,025 $380 $380 $380 $380 CFL -$2,150 $765 $765 $765 $765 Hint: NPV = PV inflows – Cost IRR: Internal Rate of Return IRR is the discount rate that forces PV inflows = cost. A. $272.51 B. $306.08 C. $377.26 D. $340.98 E. $240.19 PLEASE SHOW YOUR WORK USING BA II CALCULATOR. THANK YOU.arrow_forward“The stand-alone risk of an individual corporate project may be quite high, but viewed in the context of its effect on stockholders’ risk, the project’s true risk may be much lower." How does the correlation between returns on a project and returns on the firm’s other assets affect the project’s risk?arrow_forward
- A firm is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO wants to use the IRR criterion, while the CFO favors the NPV method. You were hired to advise the firm on the best procedure. If the wrong decision criterion is used, how much potential value would the firm lose? WACC: 5.29 % 0 1 2 3 4 CFS -$ 1,036 $380 $380 $380 $380…arrow_forwardWSP Inc. is involved in a wide range of unrelated projects. The company will pursue any project that it thinks will create value for its stockholders. Consequently, the risk level of the company’s projects tends to vary a great deal from project to project. If WSP Inc. does not risk-adjust its discount rate for specific projects properly, which of the following is likely to occur over time? Check all that apply. The firm will increase in value. The firm’s overall risk level will increase. The firm could potentially reject projects that provide a higher rate of return than the company should require. When a project involves an entirely new product line, the firm may be able to obtain betas from to calculate a weighted average cost of capital (WACC) for its new product line. Consider the case of another company. Chrome Printing is evaluating two mutually exclusive projects. They both require a $1 million investment today and have expected NPVs of…arrow_forwardFor each of the four questions below, identify whether the statement made in each question is correct or not and provide explanations. (b) When it comes to determining whether to take a project, the firm needs to calculate the NPV and assess the risk of it. For a highly leveraged firm, if the NPV is negative and the project is very risky, taking it is not beneficial for the firm. More specifically, the equity and debt holders will lose money because the overall firm value is highly likely decreased by that NPV.arrow_forward
- A tire manufacturing firm is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. What is the cost of capital at which the decision to take project L (or S) based on NPV will contradict the decision based on IRR method? Hint: Calculate the crossover rate and explain how the crossover rate would influence your decision to take project L or project S based on NPV vs. IRR? Show your excel work and thoroughly explain your answer. See cash flows below: Year 0 1 2 3 4 Project L: CFL -$2,050 $770 $780 $790 $795 Project S: CFS -$4,300 $1,300 $1,510 $1,520 $1,530arrow_forwardWSP Inc. is involved in a wide range of unrelated projects. The company will pursue any project that it thinks will create value for its stockholders. Consequently, the risk level of the company's projects tends to vary a great deal from project to project. If WSP Inc. does not risk-adjust its discount rate for specific projects properly, which of the following is likely to occur over time? Check all that apply. The firm will become more valuable. The firm's overall risk level will increase. The firm could potentially reject projects that provide a higher rate of return than the company requires. Generally, a positive correlation exists between a project's returns and the returns on the firm's other assets. If this correlation is risk will be a good proxy for within-firm risk. Consider the case of another company: □ Chrome Printing is evaluating two mutually exclusive projects. They both require a $1 million investment today and have expected NPVS of $200,000. Management conducted a…arrow_forwardNoe Drilling Inc. is considering Projects S and L, whose cash flows are shown below. These projects are mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable. The CEO believes the IRR is the best selection criterion, while the CFO advocates the MIRR. If the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher IRR rather than the one with the higher MIRR, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i.e., what's the NPV of the chosen project versus the maximum possible NPV? Note that (1) "true value" is measured by NPV, and (2) under some conditions the choice of IRR vs. MIRR will have no effect on the value lost. WACC: CFs CFL 10.50% 0 1 2 3 -$1,200 $590 $610 $170 -$2,950 $815 $815 $860 a. $322.54 b. $291.89 c. $113.67 d. $125.60 e. $0.00 4 $170 $1,650arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Essentials Of InvestmentsFinanceISBN:9781260013924Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.Publisher:Mcgraw-hill Education,
- Foundations Of FinanceFinanceISBN:9780134897264Author:KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. WilliamPublisher:Pearson,Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou...FinanceISBN:9781337395250Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. HoustonPublisher:Cengage LearningCorporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i...FinanceISBN:9780077861759Author:Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan ProfessorPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Essentials Of Investments
Finance
ISBN:9781260013924
Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:Mcgraw-hill Education,
Foundations Of Finance
Finance
ISBN:9780134897264
Author:KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William
Publisher:Pearson,
Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou...
Finance
ISBN:9781337395250
Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i...
Finance
ISBN:9780077861759
Author:Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Capital Budgeting Introduction & Calculations Step-by-Step -PV, FV, NPV, IRR, Payback, Simple R of R; Author: Accounting Step by Step;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyBw-NnAkHY;License: Standard Youtube License