There is some evidence that high school students justify cheating in class on the basis of poor teacher skills or low levels of teachercaring (Murdock, Miller, & Kohlhardt, 2004). Students appear to rationalize their cheating behavior based on perceptions of how theirteachers view cheating. Poor teachers are thought not to know or care whether students cheat, so cheating in their classes is okay.Good teachers, on the other hand, do care and are alert to cheating, so students tend not to cheat in their classes.The scores below represent judgments of the acceptability of cheating for the students in each sample (a higher number means it ismore acceptable to cheat). Is there a difference in the student ratings of how acceptable it is to cheat based on teacher type?Use an ANOVA with a = .05 to determine whether there are any significant differences among the three types of teachers in theacceptability of cheating based on student ratings. Fill in missing values in the data table and then show all work for the 4 steps ofhypothesis testingPoor TeacherAverage TeacherGood TeacherT = 20ΣΧ2 = 393G =T = 36T = 16SS = 30SS = 33SS = 42N =n =6n = 8n = = 10M =M =M==k =

To determine if there is a difference in the student ratings of the acceptability of cheating based…

Answered: There is some evidence that high school…

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018

18th Edition

ISBN:9780079039897

Author:Carter

Publisher:Carter

Chapter4: Equations Of Linear Functions

Section4.5: Correlation And Causation

Problem 18HP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

What is meant by the sample space of an experiment?
There is some evidence that high school students justify cheating in class on the basis of poor teacher skills or low levels of teacher caring (Murdock, Miller, & Kohlhardt, 2004). Students appear to rationalize their illicit behavior based on perceptions of how their teachers view cheating. Poor teachers are thought not to know or care whether students cheat, so cheating in their class is okay. Good teachers, on the other hand, do care and are alert to cheating, so students tend not to cheat in their classes. Following are hypothetical data similar to the actual research results. The scores represent judgements of the acceptability of cheating for the students in each sample. Poor Teacher Average Teacher Good Teacher n = 6 n = 8 n = 10 N = 24 G = 72 ∑X2 = 393 M = 6 M = 2 M = 2 SS = 30 SS = 33 SS = 42 Use an ANOVA with an alpha level of .05 to determine whether there are a significant differences in student judgements…
There is some evidence that high school students justify cheating in class on the basis of poor teacher skills or low levels of teacher caring (Murdock, Miller, and Kohlhardt, 2004). Students appear to rationalize their illicit behavior based on perceptions of how their teachers view cheating. Poor teachers are thought not to know or care whether students cheat, so cheating in their classes is okay. Good teachers, on the other hand, do care and are alert to cheating, so students tend not to cheat in their classes. Following are hypothetical data similar to the actual research results. The scores represent judgments of the acceptability of cheating for the students in the sample. Poor Average Good Teacher Teacher Teacher n = 6 n = 10 N = 24 M = 6 M = 2 M = 2 G = 72 SS = 30 SS = 33 SS = 42 ΣΧ2393 Use an ANOVA with a = .05 to determine whether there are significant differences in student judgments depending on how they see their teachers. (Use two decimal places for F and F-critical.)…
Do ethnic group and gender influence the type of care that a heart patient receives? The following pas- sage is from the article “Heart Care Reflects Race and Sex, Not Symptoms” (USA Today, February 25, 1999, reprinted with permission):Previous research suggested blacks and women were less likely than whites and men to get cardiac cathe- terization or coronary bypass surgery for chest pain or a heart attack. Scientists blamed differences in illness severity, insurance coverage, patient preference, and health care access. The researchers eliminated those differences by videotaping actors—two black men, two black women, two white men, and two white women—describing chest pain from identical scripts. They wore identical gowns, used identical gestures, and were taped from the same position. Researchers asked 720 primary care doctors at meetings of the American College of Physicians or the American Academy of Family Physicians to watch a tape and recommend care. The doctors thought the…
There is some evidence that high school students justify cheating in class on the basis of poor teacher skills or low levels of teacher caring (Murdock, Miller, & Kohlhardt, 2004).Students appear to rationalize their illicit behavior based on perceptions of how their teachers view cheating. Poor teachers are thought not to know or care whether students cheat, so cheating in their classes is okay. Good teachers, on the other hand, do care and are alert to cheating, so students tend not to cheat in their classes. Following are hypothetical data similar to the actual research results. The scores represent judgments of the acceptability of cheating for the students in each sample. Poor Teacher Average Teacher Good Teacher n = 6 M = 6 n = 8 M = 2 n = 10 M = 2 N = 24 G = 72 SS = 30 SS = 33 SS = 42 ΣX2 = 393 a. Use an ANOVA with α = .05 to determine whether there are any significant differences in student judgments depending on…
Suppose that the Campus Heavy Drinkers Alliance and the Campus Temperance Union have different perceptions of the severity of the alcohol abuse problem on their campus. The Campus Heavy Drinkers Alliance promotes alcohol use, arguing “as much as possible, as often as possible.” The Campus Temperance Union, on the other hand, has campaigned for the prohibition of alcohol on campus, arguing “rarely, if ever.” The student government is considering new campus alcohol policies and has asked both groups to present their assessments of the situation. Graph I Graph I is presented by because it the appearance of how much alcohol is used on campus. Graph II is presented by because it the appearance of how much alcohol is used on campus.
Motivational speakers want to be perceived as trustworthy. One hypothesis is that speakers who exhibit immediacy behaviors such as making eye contact, smiling and leaning forward might be perceived as more trustworthy than those who do not engage in these behaviors. To test this hypothesis, a psychologist obtained data from 26 participants. For people in a non-immediacy group, the speaker did not engage in any immediacy behaviors. For the immediacy group, however, the speaker made eye contact, smiled and leaned forward while giving a speech. After the speech, participants rated the speaker on a scale of trustworthiness ranging from 1 (not at all trustworthy) to 9 (highly trustworthy). The following data were obtained. Test whether the immediacy behaviors of the speaker affect trustworthiness rating. No immediacy behavior Immediacy behavior 4 4 7 4 5 3 6 5 3 5 9 8 4 6 8 7 6 3 8 6 7 5 7 8 7 6…
Roughly ten percent of elementary schools in California have a system whereby 4th to 6th graders share a common classroom and a single teacher (multi-age, multi-grade classroom). a. Suggest an experimental design that would allow you to assess the effect of learning in this environment. b. Mention some of the threats to internal and external validity C. and how you would attempt to circumvent these.
The following data are from an experiment designed to investigate the perception of corporate ethical values among individuals who are in marketing. Three groups are considered: management, research and advertising (higher scores indicate higher ethical values). Marketing Managers Marketing Research Advertising 5 10 5 4 10 6 3 9 5 4 9 4 5 10 5 3 9 5 Test whether there is a significant difference between the means for marketing managers (1), marketing research specialists (2), and advertising specialists (3). Difference Absolute Value Conclusion x1-x2 - Select your answer -No significant differenceSignificant differenceItem 10 x1-x3 - Select your answer -No significant differenceSignificant differenceItem 12 x2-x3

Recommended textbooks for you

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…

Algebra

ISBN:

9780079039897

Author:

Carter

Publisher:

McGraw Hill

Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…

Algebra

ISBN:

9781680331141

Author:

HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT

Publisher:

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

College Algebra (MindTap Course List)

Algebra

ISBN:

9781305652231

Author:

R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…

Algebra

ISBN:

9780079039897

Author:

Carter

Publisher:

McGraw Hill

Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…

Algebra

ISBN:

9781680331141

Author:

HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT

Publisher:

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

College Algebra (MindTap Course List)

Algebra

ISBN:

9781305652231

Author:

R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS