a. In the country of Estanbalu, there are plans to cease international trade. You are assigned asan economist to present to the Minister, the possible gains of engaging in free trade usingdiagrams where possible. b. Clearly explain and illustrate the gains from exchange and specialization. Answer only question b

a. In the country of Estanbalu, there are plans to cease international trade. You are assigned asan economist to present to the Minister, the possible gains of engaging in free trade usingdiagrams where possible. b. Clearly explain and illustrate the gains from exchange and specialization. Answer only question b

Microeconomics A Contemporary Intro

10th Edition

ISBN:9781285635101

Author:MCEACHERN

Publisher:MCEACHERN

Chapter19: International Trade

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3QFR

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose there are two countries Peru and Japan that produce Food and Fuel. Peru can produce 7,523 units of Food or 17,853 units of Fuel using a labour force of 8000. Japan can produce 5,733 units of Food or 24,156 units of Fuel using a labour force of 5000. (g) If the terms of trade is 2 to 1 in favour of the country with the comparative advantage in food. Determine the combination of the two goods that each country will consume after trade if the country with the comparative advantage in fuel imports 4000 units of food. Label this point B and B* respectively. h) Who gains from trade? Who loses? What is the impact if any on the world? (i) What should the terms of trade be to make trade beneficial for BOTH Japan and Peru? Explain.
(e) Assume that Home and Foreign open to trade with each other. Explain how is the pattern of trade (which good will each country export and import) determined
A free-trade equilibrium exists in which United States exports Food and imports clothing from China. The goods are produced with two factors: capital and labour. The trade pattern is the one predicted by the H-O theory. a. Show standard trade model graphically and explain the effect on quantities produced, quantities consumed and welfares of free trade in the United States and China respectively.b. Show graphically an increase now occurs in the U.S. endowment of capital, its abundant factor.1. What is the effect on the shape and position of the U.S. production-possibility curve?2. What is the effect on the actual production quantities in the United States if the relative product price is unchanged? Explain.
sugar, You have been asked to analyze the opportunity costs and comparative advantages to recommend an efficient trading relationship. Consider the production data provided. Prepare a brief report that: 3. Calculate and compare the opportunity costs of producing 1 unit of corn and 1 unit of sugar in each country. Which country has the lower opportunity cost for each good? 2. Determine which good each country has a comparative advantage in producing sugar and which one has a comparative advantage in producing corn. Explain your analysis. 3. Recommend a trading relationship that allows the countries to specialize based on comparative advantage. How would trade Improve economic efficiency? 4. Think about your own interests, skills, and opportunities. In what areas do you potentially have a comparative advantage over your peers or co-workers? Are there goods or services you could provide to others more efficiently? How could you maximize your advantages to achieve positive gains from trade…
Using the Heckscher-Ohiln trade model, we would expect that in a nation that is labor abundant that exports potatoes, an increase in the quantity of land (the other factor of production) would... A) Worsen the terms of trade for that nation B) Improve the terms of trade for that nation C) Raise wages in that nation D) Both B and C
What are the positive effects of international trade? Select one: a.stimulates and facilitates the full use of national capital; b.ensure the full use of the resources available in each country, contributing to market growth; c.it is a tool sometimes used to transfer new ideas and technologies; d.does not contribute to the fight against monopolistic tendencies;