write a well-thought-out reflexive paper. Structure of reflexive paper to a standard format of an essay.How did you approach ethical dilemmas wherein there are conflicts between internalist and externalist principles?Which principle is significantly more pragmatic?Are your values primarily contingent on the principles mandated by your institution/ desired profession?Are your values predominantly influenced by external factors such as social norms?Which method of applied ethics do you deem more viable?Cite situations that would substantiate your perspectiveDo you believe that the top-down model is more applicable?Do you think that the bottom-up model is generally more feasible?Is specification really necessary or does it promote biases when it comes to different sectors?In which specific instances do you think specifications would be necessary for your field?Do you believe that concessions are necessary for the refinement of academic theories or should scholars stand firm on the theories that they espouse?How do you personally handle problems of conflicts and disagreements when they arise, especially given the context of academic discussions?

"Since you have posted a question with multiple sub parts, we will provide the solution only to the…

write a well-thought-out reflexive paper. Structure of reflexive paper to a standard format of an essay. How did you approach ethical dilemmas wherein there are conflicts between internalist and externalist principles? Which principle is significantly more pragmatic? Are your values primarily contingent on the principles mandated by your institution/ desired profession?

write a well-thought-out reflexive paper. Structure of reflexive paper to a standard format of an essay. How did you approach ethical dilemmas wherein there are conflicts between internalist and externalist principles? Which principle is significantly more pragmatic? Are your values primarily contingent on the principles mandated by your institution/ desired profession?