When a computer processor has many instructions running at the same time, how can it avoid wasting computation cycles that it would otherwise spend if it were only performing one instruction? It is necessary to describe what occurred as a direct result of what they did in the prior sentence.

When a computer processor has many instructions running at the same time, how can it avoid wasting computation cycles that it would otherwise spend if it were only performing one instruction? It is necessary to describe what occurred as a direct result of what they did in the prior sentence.

Name: When a computer processor has many instructions running at the same ti
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T06:51:23.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: When a computer processor has many instructions running at the same time, how can it avoid wasting computation cycles that it would otherwise spend if it were only performing one instruction? It is necessary to describe what occurred as a direct resu

Systems Architecture

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305080195

Author:Stephen D. Burd

Publisher:Stephen D. Burd

Chapter4: Processor Technology And Architecture

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 26VE: _____ is a CPU design technique in which instruction execution is divided into multiple stages and...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

How can a computer processor avoid wasting calculation cycles that it would otherwise use if it were just executing one instruction when it has many instructions running at once? What happened as a direct consequence of what they did in the preceding sentence should be stated.
When a computer processor has many instructions running at the same time, how can it avoid wasting computation cycles that it would otherwise spend if it were simply performing one instruction? It should be indicated what occurred as a direct result of what they did in the prior phrase.
How can a computer's processor keep from wasting computation cycles that it would use if it were carrying out a single instruction when it has many instructions running at once? What transpired as a direct result of their actions in the preceding phrase needs to be made clear.
If many instructions were carried out at the same time on a computer, it would be a waste of the calculation cycles that the CPU has available. What steps may be taken to avoid the consequences of this? Did their acts have any kind of repercussions?
How can a computer processor prevent the loss of calculation cycles when carrying out a large number of instructions all at once? Describe the events that took place as a direct consequence of their actions.
What happens if the CPU is organised so that several tasks have the same priority?
While the CPU waits for an interrupt, the subsequent task might be executed. Should the sentence be put on hold? Why don't we simply execute the operation and forget about the details?
To what extent can you compare and contrast the various CPU Scheduling Algorithms in a written essay?
How can a computer processor avoid wasting computing cycles that it would otherwise use if it were just carrying out one instruction at a time when it is simultaneously executing a number of instructions at the same time? It need to be made clear what happened as a direct consequence of what they did in the preceding phrase in this sentence.
So, what exactly does "reduced" imply when applied to a computer that only has a subset of the standard set of instructions to follow?
How is it possible for a computer system to avoid wasting processing cycles when it is required to carry out a large number of activities all at once? Describe the events that transpired as a direct consequence of the actions they took.
If many instructions were to run on a computer's processor at once, the CPU's processing power would be squandered. Just what can we do to stop this from happening? Did their acts have any repercussions, if any?