QUESTION 1a)i) What happens to ordinary least squares estimators if their variances of the residualis not constant?ii) Consider the following regression model. The dependent variable Y, using data for 60different countries in the year 2018, where X, X 2 and X3, are three explanatory variables.Yi = Bo + B,X1 - B2X2 + B>Xa + µR? = 0.92If the variances of the residual is not constant was suspected in the model.Based on the information above perform an appropriate test to detect the problem at 5%level of significance given auxiliary coefficient of determination is equal 0.398.

Name: QUESTION 1a)i) What happens to ordinary least squares estimators if t
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:06:16.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: QUESTION 1a)i) What happens to ordinary least squares estimators if their variances of the residualis not constant?ii) Consider the following regression model. The dependent variable Y, using data for 60different countries in the year 2018, where X,

Given information: The regression output is given.

Answered: What happens to ordinary least squares…

Math

Statistics

What happens to ordinary least squares estimators if their variances of the residual not constant?

Calculus For The Life Sciences

2nd Edition

ISBN:9780321964038

Author:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.

Publisher:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.

Chapter1: Functions

Section1.EA: Extended Application Using Extrapolation To Predict Life Expectancy

Problem 5EA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Olympic Pole Vault The graph in Figure 7 indicates that in recent years the winning Olympic men’s pole vault height has fallen below the value predicted by the regression line in Example 2. This might have occurred because when the pole vault was a new event there was much room for improvement in vaulters’ performances, whereas now even the best training can produce only incremental advances. Let’s see whether concentrating on more recent results gives a better predictor of future records. (a) Use the data in Table 2 (page 176) to complete the table of winning pole vault heights shown in the margin. (Note that we are using x=0 to correspond to the year 1972, where this restricted data set begins.) (b) Find the regression line for the data in part ‚(a). (c) Plot the data and the regression line on the same axes. Does the regression line seem to provide a good model for the data? (d) What does the regression line predict as the winning pole vault height for the 2012 Olympics? Compare this predicted value to the actual 2012 winning height of 5.97 m, as described on page 177. Has this new regression line provided a better prediction than the line in Example 2?
Find the equation of the regression line for the following data set. x 1 2 3 y 0 3 4
Respiratory Rate Researchers have found that the 95 th percentile the value at which 95% of the data are at or below for respiratory rates in breath per minute during the first 3 years of infancy are given by y=101.82411-0.0125995x+0.00013401x2 for awake infants and y=101.72858-0.0139928x+0.00017646x2 for sleeping infants, where x is the age in months. Source: Pediatrics. a. What is the domain for each function? b. For each respiratory rate, is the rate decreasing or increasing over the first 3 years of life? Hint: Is the graph of the quadratic in the exponent opening upward or downward? Where is the vertex? c. Verify your answer to part b using a graphing calculator. d. For a 1- year-old infant in the 95 th percentile, how much higher is the walking respiratory rate then the sleeping respiratory rate? e. f.
For the following table of data. x 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 y 0 0.5 1 2 2.5 3 3 4 4.5 5 a. draw a scatterplot. b. calculate the correlation coefficient. c. calculate the least squares line and graph it on the scatterplot. d. predict the y value when x is 11.