The Senate committee is working on tax reform for telecommunications services in the USA. After deregulation, the telecom market has become very competitive and the high telecom tax rate (25%) reduces business growth. Estimates indicate that the current monthly demand for telecom services is given by Q^d=300-4P and the market supply is Q^s=3P-120P (both in millions), where P is the monthly price of telecom services. The Commission plans tax reform that would cut a tax rate to 15%, leading to a new supply function Q^s=4P-60. How much will the customer save on average during a month as a result of the proposed legislation? How will tax revenues change?

The Senate committee is working on tax reform for telecommunications services in the USA. After deregulation, the telecom market has become very competitive and the high telecom tax rate (25%) reduces business growth. Estimates indicate that the current monthly demand for telecom services is given by Q^d=300-4P and the market supply is Q^s=3P-120P (both in millions), where P is the monthly price of telecom services. The Commission plans tax reform that would cut a tax rate to 15%, leading to a new supply function Q^s=4P-60. How much will the customer save on average during a month as a result of the proposed legislation? How will tax revenues change?

Micro Economics For Today

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337613064

Author:Tucker, Irvin B.

Publisher:Tucker, Irvin B.

Chapter5: Price Elasticity Of Demand And Supply

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 25SQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

If the demand for automobiles is price elastic and an excise tax is levied on sellers of automobiles that causes a 10% increase in the price of automobiles paid by buyers, then: The quantity demanded of automobiles will decrease by more than 10% and buyers will bear a proportionally larger share of the direct burden of the tax than sellers. The quantity demanded of automobiles will decrease by more than 10% and sellers will bear a proportionally larger share of the direct burden of the tax than buyers. The quantity demanded of automobiles will decrease by less than10% and total revenues from auto sales will increase. The quantity demanded of automobiles will decrease by less than 10% and total revenues from auto sales will decrease.
The tax-inclusive price of a carton of cigarettes in Canada is $100 per carton. Per capita consumption is 10 cartons. Federal and provincial taxes are currently $50 per carton. Suppose the two levels of government wish to increase the cigarette tax by 20 percent. If the price elasticity of demand is -0.25, what is the additional per capita tax revenue that the two levels of government can expect to collect?
Suppose an economist estimates the price elasticity of demand for sugary drinks is -4.2, while its price elasticity of supply is 1.2. If the government decides to impose a per-unit tax of $9 per can of sugary drinks sold, how would the market price of sugary drinks be affected? Show your calculation
According to the article, after the city of Berkeley imposed a $0.01 per ounce tax on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), by what percent did consumption of SSBs fall among Berkeley's low-income residents? Who was Berkeley's tax levied on in city law? Buyers or sellers? Assume that the price elasticity of supply for SSBs is elastic and the price elasticity of demand for SSBs is inelastic. What would be the outcome of the sales tax on sugary drinks if the law says that the tax is levied on sellers of the drinks? Who will pay the tax? Assume that the price elasticity of supply for SSBs is elastic and the price elasticity of demand for SSBs is inelastic. What would be the outcome of the sales tax on sugary drinks if the law says that the tax is levied on buyers of the drinks? Who will pay the tax? Explain why your answers to #3 and #4 are different or similar. What determines who pays the tax? What is your opinion of a tax on sugary drinks in your community? Would you be in favor or…
Suppose the price elasticity of demand for smartphones is 0.5 (absolute value), while the price elasticity of supply is 1.9. If the government imposes a per-unit tax of $100 on the sellers of smartphones, how will the price and quantity transacted of smartphones change? Will the sellers or the buyers bear a larger tax burden? Will the market be able to achieve economic efficiency after the tax is imposed? Explain with a diagram.
The demand and supply equations for a product are: Qd = 300 - 6P and Qs = -40 + 6P. Determine the market equilibrium and draw graphs. Suppose that the government decides to impose a flat tax of 10% on each unit sold. Show that the price that consumer pay would be the same if the government imposed a tax of Rs. 1.70 per unit sold. Draw graphs and explain. Also calculate the total revenue earned by sellers before and after the tax, the tax revenue raised by the government, changes in consumer and producers surplus and dead weight loss.
The greater the price elasticity of supply and demand, the more the market volume decreases when excise tax is imposed. Therefore, the net economic loss is large, and the one with less price elasticity among consumers and suppliers is relatively pay less tax
Suppose supply is P= 4 + (1/4)Qs and demand is P= 58 ―(1/2)Qd. Suppose at the market equilibrium, the price elasticity of supply is 5/9 and the price elasticity of demand is 10/9. Approximately what proportion of a small per unit tax will be paid by consumers?
Harding Enterprises has developed a new product called the “Quest Simulator (QS)”. The market demand for this product is given as follows: Q = 240 - 4P. If QS is priced at $40, what is the point price elasticity of demand? Is demand elastic or inelastic? What is the maximum amount that consumers are willing to pay for the quantity demanded at the price of $40? (hint: it includes both the total expenditures and the consumer surplus) If the price of QS is increased slightly from $40, what will happen to the total expenditure on the product? What will happen to the consumer surplus? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
Green et al. (2005) estimate that the demand elasticity is -0.47 and the long-run supply elasticity is 12.0 for almonds. The corresponding elasticities are - 0.68 and 0.73 for cotton and - 0.26 and 0.64 for processing tomatoes. If the government were to apply a specific tax to each of these commodities, what incidence would fall on consumers? The incidence of a specific almond tax that would fall on consumers is percent. (Enter numeric responses using real numbers rounded to one decimal place.) eid clothing - Google Search 2 W O stv MacBook Air 80 DII DD esc F1 F2 F3 F4 F6 F7 FB F9 F10 ! @ # $ & 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 Q W E T Y U tab A S D F G H. J caps lock .... この

The demand for mineral water is P=10 – (2/3) Q and supply function for mineral water isP=1+(1/3)Q What is the burden of the tax on producers and consumers and explain how the tax burden isrelated to elasticities? thanks in advance!
The demand for X is given by X = 100-2Px, and its supply is perfectly elastic at Px = 14. The demand for Y is given by Y = 3500-3Py, and its supply is perfectly elastic at Py 18. Suppose that the government must raise R = $1,000 using a consumption tax on X and Y. 1. The elasticity of demand for X at market equilibrium is ɛx = 2. The elasticity of demand for Y at market equilibrium is ɛ, = 3. A Ramsey optimal tax of t on X and t, on Y, would have a tax ratio of tt,= 4. Given that the government must raise R $1,000, the optimal tax rate for X is ty = and the optimal tax rate for Y is tx =