The project manager of a steel manufacturing factory in Hamilton puts forth a proposal to the senior management for the immediate purchase of a specialized machine that costs $2,750,000. She forecasted that it would increase the profits through improved productivity by $1,200,000 in the first year, $1,150,000 in the second year, and $960,400 in the third year. At the end of the third year, the machine would have a salvage value of $500,000. Compute the NPV and determine if this is a sound investment proposal for a cost of capital of: a) 10%? b) 15%? c) 20%?

The project manager of a steel manufacturing factory in Hamilton puts forth a proposal to the senior management for the immediate purchase of a specialized machine that costs $2,750,000. She forecasted that it would increase the profits through improved productivity by $1,200,000 in the first year, $1,150,000 in the second year, and $960,400 in the third year. At the end of the third year, the machine would have a salvage value of $500,000. Compute the NPV and determine if this is a sound investment proposal for a cost of capital of: a) 10%? b) 15%? c) 20%?

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337514835

Author:MOYER

Publisher:MOYER

Chapter10: Capital Budgeting: Decision Criteria And Real Option

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 14P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Gina Ripley, president of Dearing Company, is considering the purchase of a computer-aided manufacturing system. The annual net cash benefits and savings associated with the system are described as follows: The system will cost 9,000,000 and last 10 years. The companys cost of capital is 12 percent. Required: 1. Calculate the payback period for the system. Assume that the company has a policy of only accepting projects with a payback of five years or less. Would the system be acquired? 2. Calculate the NPV and IRR for the project. Should the system be purchasedeven if it does not meet the payback criterion? 3. The project manager reviewed the projected cash flows and pointed out that two items had been missed. First, the system would have a salvage value, net of any tax effects, of 1,000,000 at the end of 10 years. Second, the increased quality and delivery performance would allow the company to increase its market share by 20 percent. This would produce an additional annual net benefit of 300,000. Recalculate the payback period, NPV, and IRR given this new information. (For the IRR computation, initially ignore salvage value.) Does the decision change? Suppose that the salvage value is only half what is projected. Does this make a difference in the outcome? Does salvage value have any real bearing on the companys decision?
Cameron Industries is purchasing a new chemical vapor depositor in order to make silicon chips. It will cost $7,000,000 to buy the machine and $15,000 to have it delivered and installed. Building a clean room in the plant for the machine will cost an additional $3 million. The machine is expected to raise gross profits by $4,000,000 per year, starting at the end of the first year, with associated costs of $1 million for each of those years. The machine is expected to have a working life of five years and will be depreciated over those five years. The marginal tax-rate is 20%. What are the incremental free cash flows associated with the new machine in year 2? A. $1,597,000 B. $1,403,000 C. $1,397,000 O D. $2,680,600
A piece of new equipment has been proposed by engineers to increase the productivity of a certain manual welding operation. The investment cost is $25,000, and the equipment will have a market (salvage) value of $5,000 at the end of its expected life of five years. Increased productivity attributable to the equipment will amount to $8,000 per year after extra operating costs have been subtracted from the value of the additional production. Use a spreadsheet to evaluate the IRR of the proposed equipment. suppose that ∈=MARR = 20% per year. What is the project’s ERR, and is the project acceptable? Is the investment a good one?
A piece of new equipment has been proposed by engineers to increase the productivity of a certain manual welding operation. The investment cost is $25,000, and the equipment will have a market (salvage) value of $5,000 at the end of its expected life of five years. Increased productivity attributable to the equipment will amount to $8,000 per year after extra operating costs have been subtracted from the value of the additional production. Use a spreadsheet to evaluate the IRR of the proposed equipment. Is the investment a sound one? Recall that the MARR is 20% per year
Cameron Industries is purchasing a new chemical vapor depositor in order to make silicon chips. It will cost $6,000,000 to buy the machine and $20,000 to have it delivered and installed Building a clean room in the plant for the machine will cost an additional $3 million. The machine is expected to raise gross profits by $3,000,000 per year, starting at the end of the first year, with associated costs of $1 million for each of those years. The machine is expected to have a working life of six years and will be depreciated over those six years. The marginal tax rate is 20%. What are the incremental free cash flows associated with the new machine in year 0? OA-$6,000,000 OB. -$8,118,000 C. $1,003,333 OD. -$9.020,000
A piece of new equipment has been proposed by engineers to increase the productivity of a certain manual welding operation. The investment cost is $25,000, and the equipment will have a market value of $5,000 at the end of a study period of five years. Increased productivity attributable to the equipment will amount to $8,000 per year after extra operating costs have been subtracted from the revenue generated by the additional production. Evaluate the IRR of the proposed equipment. Is the investment a good one? Recall that the MARR is 20% per year.
A piece of new equipment has been proposed by engineers to increase theproductivity of a certain manual welding operation. The investment cost is $25,000, and the equipment will have a market (salvage) value of $5,000 at the end of its expected life of five years. Increased productivity attributable to the equipment will amount to $8,000 per year after extra operating costs have been subtracted from the value of the additional production. Use a spreadsheet to evaluate the IRR of the proposed equipment. Is the investment a good one? Recall that the MARR is 20% per year. Create a single spreadsheet that calculates PW, FW, AW, IRR, and ERR for the proposed investment. Assume that ∈= MARR = 20% per year. Does your recommendation change if the MARR decreases to 18%? Increases to 22%?
Crane Lumber, Inc., is considering purchasing a new wood saw that costs $40,000. The saw will generate revenues of $100,000 per year for five years. The cost of materials and labor needed to generate these revenues will total $60,000 per year, and other cash expenses will be $10,000 per year. The machine is expected to sell for $3,900 at the end of its five-year life and will be depreciated on a straight-line basis over five years to zero. Crane’s tax rate is 26 percent, and its opportunity cost of capital is 14.20 percent. What is the project's NPV? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round final answer to the nearest whole dollar, e.g. 5,275.)
An environmental consultant is considering the installation of a water storage tank for a client. The tank is estimated to have an initial cost of $426,000, and annual maintenance costs are estimated to be $6,400 per year. As an alternative, a holding pond can be provided a short distance away at an initial cost of $180,000 for the pond plus $90,000 for pumps and piping. Annual operating and maintenance costs for the pumps and holding pond are estimated to be $17,000. The planning horizon is 20 years, and at that time, neither alternative has any salvage value. Determine the preferred alternative based on a present worth analysis with a MARR of 20%/year.
Assume that United Technologies is evaluating a proposal to change the company's manual design system to a computer-aided design (CAD) system. The proposed system is expected to save 10,000 design hours per year; an operating cost savings of $50 per hour. The annual cash expenditures of operating the CAD system are estimated to be $250,000. The CAD system requires an initial investment of $500,000. The estimated life of this system is five years with no salvage value. The tax rate is 40 percent. United Technologies has a cost of capital of 20 percent.Assume that management intends to use double-declining balance depreciation with a switch to straight-line depreciation (applied to any undepreciated balance) starting in Year 4.Determine the project's net present value
A company is considering constructing a plant to manufacture a proposed new product. The land costs $300,000, the building cost $600,000, the equipment costs $250,000, and $100,000 additional working capital is required. It is expected that the product will result in sales of $750,000 per year for 10 years ,at which the land can be sold for $400,000, the building for $350,000, and the equipment for $50,000 and all of the working capital would be recovered at EOY10. The annual expense for labor, materials, and all other items are estimated to total $500,000 and will decrease by 20,000 per year until year 10. If the company requires a MARR of 12% per year on projects of comparable risk, determine if it should invest in the new product line. a) Use IRR and AW method. b) Determine the simple and payback period (Upload the picture of your complete solutions including the correct cash flow diagram and your conclusion.
Crane Lumber, Inc., is considering purchasing a new wood saw that costs $80,000. The saw will generate revenues of $100,000 per year for five years. The cost of materials and labor needed to generate these revenues will total $60,000 per year, and other cash expenses will be $10,000 per year. The machine is expected to sell for $2,700 at the end of its five-year life and will be depreciated on a straight-line basis over five years to zero. Crane’s tax rate is 26 percent, and its opportunity cost of capital is 17.60 percent.