The following data show the brand, price ($), and the overall score for six stereo headphones that were tested by a certain magazine. The overall score is based on sound quality and effectiveness of ambient noise reduction. Scores range from 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest). The estimated regression equation for these data is ŷ = 23.462 + 0.315x, where x = price ($) and y = overall score. Brand Price ($) Score A 180 74 B 150 73 C 95 59 D 70 58 E 70 42 F 35 24 (a) Compute SST, SSR, and SSE. (Round your answers to three decimal places.) SST=SSR=SSE= (b) Compute the coefficient of determination r2. (Round your answer to three decimal places.) r2 = Comment on the goodness of fit. (For purposes of this exercise, consider a proportion large if it is at least 0.55.) The least squares line provided a good fit as a small proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line.The least squares line provided a good fit as a large proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line. The least squares line did not provide a good fit as a large proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line.The least squares line did not provide a good fit as a small proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line.
The following data show the brand, price ($), and the overall score for six stereo headphones that were tested by a certain magazine. The overall score is based on sound quality and effectiveness of ambient noise reduction. Scores range from 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest). The estimated regression equation for these data is ŷ = 23.462 + 0.315x, where x = price ($) and y = overall score. Brand Price ($) Score A 180 74 B 150 73 C 95 59 D 70 58 E 70 42 F 35 24 (a) Compute SST, SSR, and SSE. (Round your answers to three decimal places.) SST=SSR=SSE= (b) Compute the coefficient of determination r2. (Round your answer to three decimal places.) r2 = Comment on the goodness of fit. (For purposes of this exercise, consider a proportion large if it is at least 0.55.) The least squares line provided a good fit as a small proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line.The least squares line provided a good fit as a large proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line. The least squares line did not provide a good fit as a large proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line.The least squares line did not provide a good fit as a small proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line.
Calculus For The Life Sciences
2nd Edition
ISBN:9780321964038
Author:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Chapter1: Functions
Section1.CR: Chapter 1 Review
Problem 86CR
Related questions
Question
The following data show the brand, price ($), and the overall score for six stereo headphones that were tested by a certain magazine. The overall score is based on sound quality and effectiveness of ambient noise reduction. Scores range from 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest). The estimated regression equation for these data is
ŷ = 23.462 + 0.315x,
where x = price ($) and y = overall score.Brand | Price ($) | Score |
---|---|---|
A | 180 | 74 |
B | 150 | 73 |
C | 95 | 59 |
D | 70 | 58 |
E | 70 | 42 |
F | 35 | 24 |
(a)
Compute SST, SSR, and SSE. (Round your answers to three decimal places.)
SST=SSR=SSE=
(b)
Compute the coefficient of determination
r2.
(Round your answer to three decimal places.)r2
= Comment on the goodness of fit. (For purposes of this exercise, consider a proportion large if it is at least 0.55.)
The least squares line provided a good fit as a small proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line.The least squares line provided a good fit as a large proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line. The least squares line did not provide a good fit as a large proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line.The least squares line did not provide a good fit as a small proportion of the variability in y has been explained by the least squares line.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 1 images
Recommended textbooks for you
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781337111348
Author:
Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan Noell
Publisher:
Cengage Learning