Suppose that real GDP is currently $1.45 trillion, potential GDP is $1.51 trillion, the government purchases multiplier is 2.4, and the tax multiplier is - 2. a. Holding other factors constant, government purchases will need to be increased by $ 0.0250 trillion to bring the economy to equilibrium at potential GDP. (Round to four decimal places as needed.) b. Holding other factors constant, taxes have to be cut by $ 0.0300 trillion to bring the economy to equilibrium at potential GDP. (Round to four decimal places as needed.) c. Construct an example of a combination of increased government spending and tax cuts that will bring the economy to equilibrium at potential GDP. The combination of increasing government spending by $0.0600 trillion and cutting taxes by $ trillion will bring the economy to equilibrium at potential GDP. (Round to four decimal places as needed.) $0.0600 trillion $0.1440 trillion

Suppose that real GDP is currently $1.45 trillion, potential GDP is $1.51 trillion, the government purchases multiplier is 2.4, and the tax multiplier is - 2. a. Holding other factors constant, government purchases will need to be increased by $ 0.0250 trillion to bring the economy to equilibrium at potential GDP. (Round to four decimal places as needed.) b. Holding other factors constant, taxes have to be cut by $ 0.0300 trillion to bring the economy to equilibrium at potential GDP. (Round to four decimal places as needed.) c. Construct an example of a combination of increased government spending and tax cuts that will bring the economy to equilibrium at potential GDP. The combination of increasing government spending by $0.0600 trillion and cutting taxes by $ trillion will bring the economy to equilibrium at potential GDP. (Round to four decimal places as needed.) $0.0600 trillion $0.1440 trillion

Economics (MindTap Course List)

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617383

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

Chapter18: Debates In Macroeconomics Over The Role And Effects Of Government

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3QP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose that real GDP is currently $19.3 trillion, potential GDP is $23.0 trillion, the government purchases multiplier is 1.6, and the tax multiplier is -1.6. Holding other factors (such as prices and interest rates) constant, how will taxes (T) need to change to bring the economy to equilibrium at potential GDP? Provide your answer in dollars measured in trillions rounded to two decimal places. Use a negative sign for negative changes. Do not include any symbols, such as "S," "," "%," or "," in your answer. Your Answer: Answer
Suppose that real GDP is currently $17.1 trillion, potential GDP is $17.4 trillion, and the tax multiplier is -1.6. Byhow much will taxes have to change to bring the economy to equilibrium at potential GDP?
The government lowers $0.9 trillion in taxes, restoring GDP from $10 trillion to its potential level of $11.2 trillion. What is the value of the tax multiplier? A -1.33 B -0.9 C -0.75 D -1 E -1.2
Suppose the economy is operating at equilibrium, with Yo=1,000. If the government undertakes a fiscal change whereby the tax rate, t , increases by .05 and government spending increases by 50, will the budget surplus go up or down? Why?
a) What are the three fiscal policy tools and how would each be used to counter a contractionary gap? b) True or False and explain: Fiscal Policy is effective at reducing the duration of an economic contraction. c) If the spending multiplier is 2.5 and the economy is in a $500 billion contractionary gap, how much should I increase government purchases to eliminate the gap? d) Continuing with c, if the MPC is 0.8, how much would I need to increase transfer payments to eliminate the $500 billion contractionary gap? e) True or False and explain: Households always react to tax changes in a predictable manner. Module 6: Deficits and the Debt. a) Distinguish between deficit and debt. b) Explain what crowding out is and why it reduces the impact of fiscal stimulus. c) True or false and explain: The national debt represents a threat of bankruptcy. (For d and e) Suppose the interest on the debt was $600 billion. If interest is paid domestically, 90% will be spent domestically (the remainder is…
A. If your MPC = 0.6 and government spending (G) increases by $800. What will happen to the equilibrium income? The Effect of Taxation: Tax Multiplier = -MPC X Spending Multiplier Problems: B. If the MPC = 0.8 and taxes go up by $1000, what will happen to the equilibrium income? Please fully complete both problems.
K Suppose that real GDP is currently $1.18 trillion, potential GDP is $1.24 trillion, the government purchases multiplier is 2, and the tax multiplier is -1.2. a. Holding other factors constant, government purchases will need to be increased by $ trillion to bring the economy to equilibrium at potential GDP. (Round to four decimal places as needed.) b. Holding other factors constant, taxes have to be cut by $ trillion to bring the economy to equilibrium at potential GDP. (Round to four decimal places as needed.) c. Construct an example of a combination of increased government spending and tax cuts that will bring the economy to equilibrium at potential GDP. The combination of increasing government spending by economy to equilibrium at potential GDP. (Round to four decimal places as needed.) and cutting taxes by $ trillion will bring the
Question #10 - Suppose the government wishes to eliminate an inflationary gap of $100 billion and the MPC is 0.50. How much must the government cut its spending? Instead of decreasing government spending by the amount you calculate, what would be the effect of the government increasing taxes by this amount?
Suppose actual real GDP is $7.91 trillion, potential real GDP is $13.33 trillion, the marginal propensity to consume is 0.68, and that the government has a balanced budget. If we ignore price effects, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its spending to fix the gap while keeping the federal budget balanced? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)
a) Suppose that there are no crowding-out effects and the MPC is 0.8. By how much must the government increase expenditures shift the aggregate-demand curve right $10 billion? b. The model of Long-run Growth, proposes that fiscal policy can have lasting effects on savings, investment, and economic growth. On the other hand, the model of Aggregate Demand-Aggregate Supply suggests that the only long run effect of fiscal policy is an increase in the price level. How could you use the Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply model for a more accurate description of the short-run and long-run effects of an increase in government spending? Could you distinguish between different uses of government expenditures to predict their effects on prices and output?
17)Show and explain how an expansionary fiscal policy can cause crowding-out effect by using aggregate expenditure and aggregate output curves.
Suppose that real GDP for an economy is currently 16,000 billion, the government purchases multiplier is 2.2 and the tax multiplier is -1.2. If the government deploys additional spending of 600 billion and cuts taxes by 120 billion, where will GDP end up (in billion)?