Samuel recently got his first dog, and he's considering if he should pay for professional dog training. He's skeptical paying for this training is worth it, but fortunately Samuel is a statistician and friends with some researchers at the veterinary school. They randomly recruit 70 dogs to take part in the study, and a respected pet trainer in the region agrees to help train these dogs as part of the study. Prior to the study, Samuel and the vets pair off all the dogs based on both biological characteristics as well as owner characteristics. As a result, they have 35 pairs of dogs that are relatively similar. One dog in each pair is randomly chosen to receive the professional behavior training, while the other dog will not receive the training (but will still be trained by its owners). After training the dogs for two months, a second professional dog trainer is brought in to assess the obedience levels of all the dogs. Assume they are able to do so and can convert their ratings to a 0-100 point scale (treat this as being quantitative and not categorical). A 100 is a perfectly obedient dog. The second dog trainer does not know which dog received the treatment and which received the control. Professionally trained? St Dev Pair 1 Pair 2 Pair 35 Mean No Yes Diff (yes - no) 88 56 34 62.1 11.3 97 52 47 70.4 14.1 9 -4 ... 13 8.3 4.02 Histograms for each of the three rows of data indicates that they are reasonably close to being normally distributed. Calculate the appropriate test statistic to test the hypothesis H, : Ha = 0 vs. HA : Ha > 0 if µa is the true mean difference in obedience score a dog would receive if they were professionally trained instead of being solely trained by its owners. Give your answer to two digits past the decimal point. Answer: At an a 0.01 significance level, what's the formal conclusion to our hypothesis test and a reasonable interpretation of the conclusion to this study?
Samuel recently got his first dog, and he's considering if he should pay for professional dog training. He's skeptical paying for this training is worth it, but fortunately Samuel is a statistician and friends with some researchers at the veterinary school. They randomly recruit 70 dogs to take part in the study, and a respected pet trainer in the region agrees to help train these dogs as part of the study. Prior to the study, Samuel and the vets pair off all the dogs based on both biological characteristics as well as owner characteristics. As a result, they have 35 pairs of dogs that are relatively similar. One dog in each pair is randomly chosen to receive the professional behavior training, while the other dog will not receive the training (but will still be trained by its owners). After training the dogs for two months, a second professional dog trainer is brought in to assess the obedience levels of all the dogs. Assume they are able to do so and can convert their ratings to a 0-100 point scale (treat this as being quantitative and not categorical). A 100 is a perfectly obedient dog. The second dog trainer does not know which dog received the treatment and which received the control. Professionally trained? St Dev Pair 1 Pair 2 Pair 35 Mean No Yes Diff (yes - no) 88 56 34 62.1 11.3 97 52 47 70.4 14.1 9 -4 ... 13 8.3 4.02 Histograms for each of the three rows of data indicates that they are reasonably close to being normally distributed. Calculate the appropriate test statistic to test the hypothesis H, : Ha = 0 vs. HA : Ha > 0 if µa is the true mean difference in obedience score a dog would receive if they were professionally trained instead of being solely trained by its owners. Give your answer to two digits past the decimal point. Answer: At an a 0.01 significance level, what's the formal conclusion to our hypothesis test and a reasonable interpretation of the conclusion to this study?
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter4: Equations Of Linear Functions
Section4.5: Correlation And Causation
Problem 15PPS
Related questions
Question
Transcribed Image Text:Samuel recently got his first dog, and he's considering if he should pay for professional dog training. He's skeptical paying for this training is worth it,
but fortunately Samuel is a statistician and friends with some researchers at the veterinary school. They randomly recruit 70 dogs to take part in the
study, and a respected pet trainer in the region agrees to help train these dogs as part of the study.
Prior to the study, Samuel and the vets pair off all the dogs based on both biological characteristics as well as owner characteristics. As a result, they
have 35 pairs of dogs that are relatively similar. One dog in each pair is randomly chosen to receive the professional behavior training, while the other
dog will not receive the training (but will still be trained by its owners).
After training the dogs for two months, a second professional dog trainer is brought in to assess the obedience levels of all the dogs. Assume they are
able to do so and can convert their ratings to a 0-100 point scale (treat this as being quantitative and not categorical). A 100 is a perfectly obedient dog.
The second dog trainer does not know which dog received the treatment and which received the control.
Professionally
Pair 1
Pair 2
Pair 35
Mean
St Dev
trained?
No
88
56
34
62.1
11.3
...
Yes
97
52
47
70.4
14.1
..
Diff (yes - no)
9
-4
13
8.3
4.02
..
Histograms for each of the three rows of data indicates that they are reasonably close to being normally distributed.
Calculate the appropriate test statistic to test the hypothesis Ho : Ha = 0 vs. HA : Hà > 0 if µa is the true mean difference in obedience score a
dog would receive if they were professionally trained instead of being solely trained by its owners. Give your answer to two digits past the decimal
point.
Answer:
At an a = 0.01 significance level, what's the formal conclusion to our hypothesis test and a reasonable interpretation of the conclusion to this study?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt