marksUndergraduate Ad..Navarro College - A...5 New Tab¡Qué chévere! 1 Stu...***CollegeBoardAP ClassroomUnit 7 Progress Check: MCQ Part BSilvana Sierra3.45.6.101112)1314)15(16)17)18)12 oQuestion 12In a certain city the population mean commute time to work was reported as 30 minutes. The director of human resources for a certain company in the city claimed the mean commute time for thecompany's employees was greater than 30 minutes. The director surveyed 35 randomly selected employees and found that their mean commute time was 31.4 minutes. With all conditions forinference met, a hypothesis test conducted at the significance level a .0.05 resulted in a pvalue of 0.381.Which of the following is an appropriete conclusion?SuA.The director has convincing statistical evidence to conclude that the population mean commute time is greater than 30 minutes.B.The director has convincing statistical evidence to conclude that the population mean commute time is less than 30 minutes.CThe director has convincing statistical evidence to conclude that the population mean commute time is 31.4 minutes.D.The director does not ha e convincing statistical evidence to conolude that the populetion mean commute time is greater than 30 minutesThe director dpes not nave convinoing stetist.cal evidence to conclude that the population mean commute time is less than 30 minutes.Type here to searchDELL

Name: marksUndergraduate Ad..Navarro College - A...5 New Tab¡Qué chévere! 1
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:12.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: marksUndergraduate Ad..Navarro College - A...5 New Tab¡Qué chévere! 1 Stu...***CollegeBoardAP ClassroomUnit 7 Progress Check: MCQ Part BSilvana Sierra3.45.6.101112)1314)15(16)17)18)12 oQuestion 12In a certain city the population mean commute time to

The population mean commute time=μ=30. Claim: μ>30. Sample size=n=35. The sample mean=x¯=31.4.…

Math

Statistics

Question 12 D In a certain city, the population mean commute time to work was reported as 30 minutes. The director of human resources for a certain company in the city claimed the mean commute time for the company's employees was greater than 30 minutes. The director surveyed 35 randomly selected employees and found that their mean commute time was 31.4 minutes. With all conditions for inference met, a hypothesis test conducted at the significance level a= 0.05 resulted in a pvalue of 0.381. Which of the following is an appropriate conclusion? A The director has convincing statistical evidence to conclude that the population mean commute time is greater than 30 minutes. The director has convincing statistical evidence to conclude that the population mean commute time is less than 30 minutes. The director has convincing statistical evidence to conclude that the population mean commute time is 31.4 minutes The director does not have convincing statistical evidence to conclude that the population mean commute time is greater than 30 minutes. The director does not have convincing statistical evidence to conclude that the population mean commute time is less than 30 minutes