Q2: A company invested an amount of $85,000 to implement a project, and the expectedreceipts from this project during the 5 years were as follows:End the year11/2$25,000Receipts() $10,0003$35,0004$45,0005$30,000Find I.R.R and determine if the project is desirable or not If the MARR was 16%?

IRR (Internal Rate of Return)- The discount rate that results in a zero NPV for the project.-shows…

Answered: Q2: A company invested an amount of…

Practical Management Science

6th Edition

ISBN:9781337406659

Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.

Publisher:WINSTON, Wayne L.

Chapter9: Decision Making Under Uncertainty

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 30P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose your organization is deciding which of THREE projects to bid on. The information or each is in the Table 2 below. Assume that all up-front investments are not recovered, so the are shown as negative profits. Table 2: Three Projects Details Estimated Probability (P) Profits/Losses Project A 50% RM120,000 50% (RM50,000) Project B 30% RM100,000 40% RM50,000 30% (RM60,000) Project C 70% RM20,000 30% (RM5,000) Tasks: (a) Calculate the Expected Monetary Value (EMV) for each project. Then, insert all the detail: into the table. (b) Based on your result, explain on which projects you would bid. Be sure to use the EMV information and your personal risk tolerance to justify your answer.
The following payoff matrix shows the various profit outcomes for 3 projects, A, B, and C, under 2 possible states of nature: the product price is $15 or the product price is $25. Profit Project A P= $15 60 B -28 C 40 Using the maximax rule, the decision maker would choose... Multiple Choice A. B. P = $25 80 160 100 impossible to say from the information given
Kiley Electronics is considering a project that has the following cash flow data. What is the project's IRR, and should the firm accept the project based on IRR if its WACC is 13.00%? Year 0 1 2 3 Cash flows -$1,100 $450 $470 $490 13.31%; Accept 13.31%; Reject -14.64%; Reject 11.98%; Accept 11.98%; Reject
Manager Cafe "Blue Sky" is considering investing 2 (two) projects. Project X is an investment of $ 75,000 to replace a working but outdated cooling equipment. Project Y is a $ 150,000 investment to expand the dining facilities. Relevant cash flow data for the two projects over the expected 2 years are as follows: Project X Year 1 Year 2 Probability Cash Flow Probability Cash Flow 0.16 $0 0.08 $0 0.66 $50000 0.82 $50000 0.18 $100000 0.10 $100000 Project Y Year 1 Year 2 Probability Cash Flow Probability Cash Flow 0.50 $0 0.13 $0 0.50 $200000 0.74 $100000 0.13 $200000 Calculate: Expected value, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation for cash flows from each project. Compute: Risk-adjusted NPV for each project using a cost of capital of 15% for riskier projects, and 12% cost of capital for less risky projects. Which project is more…
1. Following is the payoff table for the Pittsburgh Development Corporation (PDC) Condominium Project. Amounts are in millions of dollars.State of NatureDecision Alternative Strong Demand S1 Weak Demand S2Small complex, d1 8 7Medium complex, d2 15 3Large complex, d3 20 -82. Suppose PDC is optimistic about the potential for the luxury high-rise condominium complex and that this optimism leads to an initial subjective probability assessment of 0.83 that demand will be strong (S1) and a corresponding probability of 0.17 that demand will be weak (S2). Assume the decision alternative to build the large condominium complex was found to be optimal using the expected value approach. Also, a sensitivity analysis was conducted for the payoffs associated with this decision alternative. It was found that the large complex remained optimal as long as the payoff for the strong demand was greater than or equal to $17.25 million and as long as the payoff for the weak demand was greater than or equal…
4. Using a discounted rate of 12 percent, INITIAL COST NET CASH FLOW YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 PROJECT A (BROILER) K100,000 (20,000) 10,000 40.000 40.000 150.000 PROJECT B (LAYERS) K100,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 a. Determine the net present value of project A and B b. Calculate the IRR on mutually exclusive investment of project A and B. C. Which project must the farm undertake and why?
Rare Agri-Products Ltd. is considering a new project with a projectedlife of seven (7) years. The project falls under the government’ssubsidy program for encouraging local agricultural products and iseligible for a one-time rebate of 25% on any initial equipmentinstalled for the project. The initial equipment (IE) will cost$41,000,000.An additional equipment (AE) costing$3,500,000 will be needed at the end of year 3. At the end of seven(7) years, the original equipment, IE, will have no resale value butthe supplementary equipment, AE, can be sold for $50,000. A workingcapital of $1,350,000 will be needed.The project is forecast to generate sales of agri-products over theseven years as follows:Year 1 70,000 unitsYear 2 100,000 unitsYears 3-5 250,000 unitsYears 6-7 325,000 unitsA sale price of $150 per unit for the first two years is expected andthen decline to $90 per unit thereafter as the newness of the productloses some sheen. The variable expenses will amount to 30% of salesrevenue.…
Problem 4-11 (Algorithmic) Following is the payoff table for the Pittsburgh Development Corporation (PDC) Condominium Project. Amounts are in millions of dollars. State of Nature Decision Alternative Strong Demand S₁ Weak Demand S₂ Small complex, di 6 Medium complex, dz Large complex, d3 8 14 20 3 -8 Suppose PDC is optimistic about the potential for the luxury high-rise condominium complex and that this optimism leads to an initial subjective probability assessment of 0.78 that demand will be strong (S₁) and a corresponding probability of 0.22 that demand will be weak (S₂). Assume the decision alternative to build the large condominium complex was found to be optimal using the expected value approach. Also, a sensitivity analysis was conducted for the payoffs associated with this decision alternative. It was found that the large complex remained optimal as long as the payoff for the strong demand was greater than or equal to $17.1 million and as long as the payoff for the weak demand…
Based on the following payoff table, answer the following: High Medium Low 20 20 5 25 30 11 30 12 13. 10 12 12 50 40 -28 Prior Probability 0.3 0.2 0.5 The expected value of perfect information is: Alternative A B C D E O -28. O 0. O 23. O 19. O 10.5.
Angel healthcare Ltd., has 2 investment opportunities, each costing $120000 and each have expected profit as shown below: Years Project "A' Project "B' ($) ($) 1 40000 30000 2 30000 40000 3 20000 35000 4 15000 30000 Year 1 2 3 PVIF @ 10% 0.909 0.826 0.751 4 0.683 Compute NPV & Profitability Index, Suggest which Project to be preffered at 10%cost of capital
Stinnett Transmissions, Incorporated, has the following estimates for its new gear assembly project: Price $1,220 per unit; variable costs = $3.75 million; quantity = 90,000 units. Suppose the company believes all of its estimates are accurate only to within ±15 percent. What values should the company use for the four variables given here when it performs its best-case scenario analysis? What about the worst-case scenario? Pls don't copy answer i give up vote
Rare Agri-Products Ltd. is considering a new project with a projectedlife of seven (7) years. The project falls under the government’ssubsidy program for encouraging local agricultural products and iseligible for a one-time rebate of 25% on any initial equipmentinstalled for the project. The initial equipment (IE) will cost$41,000,000. At the end of year 1, An additional equipment (AE) costing$3,500,000 will be needed at the end of year 3. At the end of seven(7) years, the original equipment, IE, will have no resale value butthe supplementary equipment, AE, can be sold for $50,000. A workingcapital of $1,350,000 will be needed.The project is forecast to generate sales of agri-products over theseven years as follows:Year 1 70,000 unitsYear 2 100,000 unitsYears 3-5 250,000 unitsYears 6-7 325,000 unitsA sale price of $150 per unit for the first two years is expected andthen decline to $90 per unit thereafter as the newness of the productloses some sheen. The variable expenses will amount…

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Practical Management Science

Operations Management

ISBN:

9781337406659

Author:

WINSTON, Wayne L.

Publisher:

Cengage,

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

Operations Management

ISBN:

9781285869681

Author:

Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Practical Management Science

Operations Management

ISBN:

9781337406659

Author:

WINSTON, Wayne L.

Publisher:

Cengage,

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

Operations Management

ISBN:

9781285869681

Author:

Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS