In a previous Paul, 44% of adults and children under the age of 18 reported that their family eat dinner together seven nights a week...use technology to find the P value.P value =_.(round to three decimal places as needed.) should one reject the null hypothesis?orshould one not reject the null hypothesis? In a previous poll, 44% of adults with children under the age of 18 reported that their family ate dinner together 7 nights a week. Suppose that, in a more recent poll,547 of 1300 adults with children under the age of 18 reported that their family ate dinner together 7 nights a week. Is there sufficient evidence that the proportion offamilies with children under the age of 18 who eat dinner together 7 nights a week has decreased at the a= 0.05 significance level?What are the null and alternative hypotheses?Ho p = 0..44 versus H,:p < 0.44Use technology to find the P-value.P-value D|(Round to three decimal places as needed.)

Name: In a previous Paul, 44% of adults and children under the age of 18 rep
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:07:00.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: In a previous Paul, 44% of adults and children under the age of 18 reported that their family eat dinner together seven nights a week...use technology to find the P value.P value =_.(round to three decimal places as needed.) should one reject the nul

Math

Statistics

In a previous Paul, 44% of adults and children under the age of 18 reported that their family eat dinner together seven nights a week... use technology to find the P value. P value =_. (round to three decimal places as needed.) should one reject the null hypothesis? or should one not reject the null hypothesis?