Give typing answer with explanation and conclusion Suppose two firms produce identical good. The inverse demand curve for the good is: P = 240-Q, where Q is the total quantity produced by the two firms. Each firm has a constant marginal cost 20 of producing the good and fixed cost = 100. Find the Cournot Nash equilibrium of this game. What quantity will each firm produce? what will be the market price? What would be the profits of each firm?

Give typing answer with explanation and conclusion Suppose two firms produce identical good. The inverse demand curve for the good is: P = 240-Q, where Q is the total quantity produced by the two firms. Each firm has a constant marginal cost 20 of producing the good and fixed cost = 100. Find the Cournot Nash equilibrium of this game. What quantity will each firm produce? what will be the market price? What would be the profits of each firm?

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter15: Imperfect Competition

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 15.3P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

QUESTION 10 Suppose there are two firms that produce an identical product. The demand curve for the product is given by P = 62 - Q where Q is the total quantity produced by the two firms. Both firms choose their individual quantities qı20 and q22 0 simultaneously. Each firm has a marginal cost of 37. What is the market price when both firms produce the quantities in the unique Nash equilibrium? Give your answer as a number to two decimal places.
1. The market (inverse) demand function for a homogeneous good is P(Q) = 10 - Q. There are two firms: firm 1 has a constant marginal cost of 2 for producing each unit of the good, and firm 2 has a constant marginal cost of 1. The two firms compete by setting their quantities of production, and the price of the good is determined by the market demand function given the total quantity. a. Calculate the Nash equilibrium in this game and the corresponding market price when firms simultaneously choose quantities. b. Now suppose firml moves earlier than firm 2 and firm 2 observes firm 1 quantity choice before choosing its quantity find optimal choices of firm 1 and firm 2.
Two firms operating in the same market must decide between charging a high price or a low price. The Payoffs are as below. Firm A's profit is listed before the comma, B's profit after the comma. Firm B Firm A Low Price High Price Low Price 16, 17 7, 28 High Price 28, 7 22, 22 If each firm tries to choose a price that is optimal, regardless of the other firm's price, what is the Nash equilibrium? Does either firm have a dominant strategy?
Which statement best describes a Nash equilibrium applies to price competition? 1. Two firms cooperate and set the price that maximizes joint profits. 2. Each firm automatically moves to the purely competitive equilibrium because it knows the other firm will eventually move to that price away. 3 given the prices chosen by its competitors, no firm has an incentive to change their prices from the equilibrium level. 4. One dominant firm sets the price, and the other firms take that’s price as if it were given by the market. 5. None of the above.
GAME THEORY: Two countries produce oil. The per unit production cost of Country 1 is C1 = $2 and of country 2 it is C2 = $4. The total demand for oil is Q = 40-p where p is the market price of a unit of oil. Each country can only produce either 5 units, 10 units or 15 units. The total production of the two countries in a Nash equilibrium is: A. 10 B. 15 C. 20 D. 25 E. 30
Consider the following normal form representation of the standard competition between firm A and firm B. Each firm can choose either standard A or standard B. Their payoffs are given as follows: Firm B A В A Firm A В 1 1 3 1 (1) (10 points) What's Nash equilibrium (NE) in this game? If there are more than one, find them all. But there is no NE, state that there is no NE. (2) (10 points) If you find a NE (or multiple Nash equilibria), is it (or are they) Pareto efficient?
Look back at Figure Suppose that the two firms switch places—the firm that was the follower now gets to go first while the firm that was the leader now has to go second. The new subgame perfect Nash equilibrium will lead to terminal node: a. A. b. B. c. C. d. D.
Three firms compete in the style of Cournot. The inverse demand is P(Q) = a - Q. Scenario 1: All three firms have the same constant marginal cost MC = c. Scenario 2: Firm 1 has MC = 0.5c, Firm 2 has MC = c, and Firm 3 has MC = 1.5c. Assume that a > 3c. Which of the following is correct? (Price means the price in Nash equilibrium.) O Price in scenario 1> Price in scenario 2 O Price in scenario 2> Price in scenario 1 O Price in scenario 1 = Price in scenario 2 O Any of the first three options is possible depending on the value of a O Any of the first three options is possible depending on the value of a and c.
Question 1 An industry consists of two firms. The demand function for the product of firm i is q = 24 - 5p; + 2pj. The marginal cost of production for each firm is zero. Find the Nash equilibrium in prices if the game is non-repeated and firms choose their prices simultaneously.
Consider the following Cournot game with two firms i = 1, 2. The demand function is P(Q) = 100 − Q, with Q = q1 + q2. The production costs for firm i are: C(qi) = 400 + 2qi . Find the nash equilibrium of this game. plz answer correct calculatuon asap plz dont answer by pepar
Economics Consider two firms that are choosing the price of competing products. The choices are contained in the payoff table. Each firm can raise price, lower price, or maintain their price. Suppose the game is played once each period forever. If both players play the strategy "always lower price" is this a Nash equilibrium? Let b = discount rate, 0 < b <1. Raise price Maintain price Lower price Firm B Raise price Maintain price Lower price 6. 4 8. 8 1.1 5, 5 4, 6 7.2 1.1 3.3 Firm A 2.7 No. because it is dominated by raising the price. No, because it is dominated by both firms raising the price. No, because it is dominated by maintaining the price. Yes.
. OPEC, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, was founded in 1969. Their original objective was to form a cartel to increase the price that they receive for their oil exports. Create a prisoner’s dilemma type game for two large members of OPEC (e.g. Saudi Arabia and Indonesia). Create numbers, where payoffs are total annual oil export revenues for each of these two countries. Verbally explain how you got your numbers. Find the Nash equilibrium. Based on this model, what strategy is in the oil exporters’ best interest (Nash or otherwise)? How do they make it happen? Create another prisoner’s dilemmamodel for all of OPEC on one side, and all non OPEC oil exporting nations on the other side. Create numbers, where payoffs are total annual oil export revenues for each of the two sides. Verbally explain how you created your numbers. Also create your numbers applying the fact that OPEC’s total production capacity is greater than total non OPEC exports…