Consider an infinitely-repeated game where the stage game is given below.Player 2Player 11, 107, 7U9, 9D10, 1Player 1 chooses rows and player 2 chooses columns. Players discount thefuture using a common discount factor d.Find Nash equilibrium in the stage-game.(a)(b) Find a Subgame Perfect Nash equilibrium in which the playersobtain (9, 9) each period. Find discount factors which couldsupport this cooperation outcome.

In the game theory, Nash equilibrium is a concept where a game has an optimal outcome and the…

Consider an infinitely-repeated game where the stage game is given below. Player 2 Player 1 R 9, 9 1, 10 D 10, 1 7, 7 Player 1 chooses rows and player 2 chooses columns. Players discount the future using a common discount factor d. (a) Find Nash equilibrium in the stage-game. (b) Find a Subgame Perfect Nash equilibrium in which the players obtain (9, 9) each period. Find discount factors which could support this cooperation outcome.

Consider an infinitely-repeated game where the stage game is given below. Player 2 Player 1 R 9, 9 1, 10 D 10, 1 7, 7 Player 1 chooses rows and player 2 chooses columns. Players discount the future using a common discount factor d. (a) Find Nash equilibrium in the stage-game. (b) Find a Subgame Perfect Nash equilibrium in which the players obtain (9, 9) each period. Find discount factors which could support this cooperation outcome.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.9P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Exercise 6.8. Consider the following extensive-form game with cardinal payoffs: 1 R O player pay 000 2 1 M 3 b 010 O player 3's payoff 1 2 221 2 000 0 0 (a) Find all the pure-strategy Nash equilibria. Which ones are also subgame perfect? (b) [This is a more challenging question] Prove that there is no mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium where Player 1 plays Mwith probability strictly between 0 and 1.
• (1,0) (1,1) Player 2 G D H (2,0) Action Player 1 Player 1 Action B Player 1 (3,-1) E Player 2 (0,1) (-1,-1) (a) Find all the Subgame Perfect Nash equilibria in this game. (b) Find all the Nash equilibria in this game. (Hint: write the game in strategic form.)
Consider the following extensive form game between player 1 and player 2. T B (2, 2) L R R (3, 1) (0, 0) (5, 0) (0, 1) (a). Find the normal form representation of this game. (show the bimatrix) (b). Find all pure strategy NE. (c). Which of these equilibria are subgame perfect?
(b) ROWENA up Answer 1: up Answer 2: In this simultaneous move game, the iterated dominance equilibrium is (Rowena's . Colin's left left Answer 3: ). This game has two Nash equilibria one of which is the iterated dominance equilibrium. The other Nash equilibrium, which is not the IDE, is (Rowena's down Colin's right down Up Down Answer 4: Left right 0,0 0,0 COLIN Right 0,0 1,1
Consider the following simultaneous game: Player 1 U D Player 2 L 30,10 -10, 20 R 10, 20 5,-10 Please indicate whether each of the following statements is true or false. Player 1 has a dominant strategy. This game has a Nash equilibrium. This game has a Nash equilibrium in pure strategies. Player 1's best response is D if player 2 plays R.
Problem 2. Consider the partnership-game we discussed in Lecture 3 (pages 81-87 of the textbook). Now change the setup of the game so that player 1 chooses x = [0, 4], and after observing the choice of x, player 2 chooses y ≤ [0, 4]. The payoffs are the same as before. (a) Find all SPNE (subgame perfect Nash equilibria) in pure strategies. (b) Can you find a Nash equilibrium, with player 1 choosing x = 1, that is not subgame perfect? Explain.
Consider a game where each player picks a number from 0 to 60. The guess that is closest to half of the average of the chosen numbers wins a prize. If several people are equally close, then they share the prize. The game theory implies that (A) all players have dominant strategies to choose 0 (B) all players have dominant strategies to choose 30 (C) there is a Nash equilibrium where all players pick 0 (D) there is a Nash equilibrium where all players pick positive numbers Behavioral data in such games suggests that (A) most subjects choose 0; (B) most subjects choose 30;(C) common answers include 30, 15, 7.5, and 0; (D) most subjects use randomization.
4. Correlated EquilibriaConstruct an example (not one from class or the reading) of a Normal form game with a correlated equilibrium that is not a Nash equilibrium.
1. Assume this game is played 2 times and there is no discounting. The whole payoff for two periods is the sum of payoffs of each period. Draw a tree of the game and solve it with subgame prefect Nash equilibrium. Explain clearly, handwritten is preferable.
An incumbent can commit to producing a large quantity of output before the potential rival decides whether to enter. The incumbent chooses whether to commit to produce a small quantity or a large quantity. The rival then decides whether to enter. Enter The payoffs are represented in the game treeillustrated in the figure to the right. What is the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium? (1,800,500) Rival Small O A. The Nash equilibrium is for the incumbent to produce the large quantity and for the rival to not enter regardless of the incumbent's quantity. (3,600,0) Don't enter O B. The Nash equilibrium is for the incumbent to produce the large quantity and for Incumbent the rival to enter regardless of the incumbent's quantity. OC. The game does not have a Nash equilibrium. O D. The Nash equilibrium is for the incumbent produce the small quantity and for Enter (1,600, - 80) Large Rival the rival to only enter if the incumbent produces the small quantity. (3,200,0) Don't enter O E. The Nash…
In the game presented in Table, what are the Nash equilibrium strategies for players A and B?
The Nash equilibrium of the accompanying game is Player 1 Multiple Choice O O O (Y. B). (X, B). X Y Z (Z. C). Player 2 A 9, 8 5, 6 10, 9 none of the provided answers because there is no Nash equilibrium in this game. B 10, 12 12, 20 13, 4 C 3, 15 4, 10 8, 12