Assume that fiscal policy can be accomplished by changing only one of G and T. In the IS-LM framework, suppose the effect on the general equilibrium output is the same between expansionary fiscal policy and expansionary monetary policy. Which one would you expect to have a greater impact on the equilibrium consumption?

Assume that fiscal policy can be accomplished by changing only one of G and T. In the IS-LM framework, suppose the effect on the general equilibrium output is the same between expansionary fiscal policy and expansionary monetary policy. Which one would you expect to have a greater impact on the equilibrium consumption?

Economics For Today

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337613040

Author:Tucker

Publisher:Tucker

Chapter18: The Keynesian Model

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9SQP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider two closed economies that are identical except for their marginal propensity to consume (MPC). Each economy is currently in equilibrium with real GDP and total expenditure equal to $100 billion, as shown by the black points on the following two graphs. Neither economy has taxes that change with income. The grey lines show the 45-degree line on each graph. The first economy's MPC is 0.5. Therefore, its initial total expenditure line has a slope of 0.5 and passes through the point (100, 100). The second economy's MPC is 0.70. Therefore, its initial total expenditure line has a slope of 0.70 and passes through the point (100, 100). Now, suppose there is an increase of $30 billion in investment in each economy.
Consider two closed economies that are identical except for their marginal propensity to consume (MPC). Each economy is currently in equilibrium with real GDP and total expenditure equal to $100 billion, as shown by the black points on the following two graphs. Neither economy has taxes that change with income. The grey lines show the 45-degree line on each graph. The first economy's MPC is 0.5. Therefore, its initial total expenditure line has a slope of 0.5 and passes through the point (100, 100). The second economy's MPC is 0.70. Therefore, its initial total expenditure line has a slope of 0.70 and passes through the point (100, 100). Now, suppose there is an increase of $30 billion in investment in each economy. Place a green line (triangle symbol) on each of the previous graphs to indicate the new total expenditure line for each economy. Then place a black point (plus symbol) on each graph showing the new level of equilibrium output. (Hint: You can see the slope and vertical…
Consider two closed economies that are identical except for their marginal propensity to consume (MPC). Each economy is currently in equilibrium with real GDP and total expenditure equal to $100 billion, as shown by the black points on the following two graphs. Neither economy has taxes that change with income. The grey lines show the 45-degree line on each graph. The first economy's MPC is 0.5. Therefore, its initial total expenditure line has a slope of 0.5 and passes through the point (100, 100). The second economy's MPC is 0.70. Therefore, its initial total expenditure line has a slope of 0.70 and passes through the point (100, 100). Now, suppose there is an increase of $30 billion in investment in each economy. Place a green line (triangle symbol) on each of the previous graphs to indicate the new total expenditure line for each economy. Then place a black point (plus symbol) on each graph showing the new level of equilibrium output.
The following are exogenous (not directly affected by income): G = 9 I = 14 X = M = 0 The consumption function is: C = k + cY, where k = 8, c = 0.6 What is the equilibrium level of GDP? State to ONE decimal place What is the multiplier for this economy? The following are exogenous (not directly affected by income): G = 11 I = 4 X = M = 0 The consumption function is: C = k + cY, where k = 3, c = 0.8 What is the equilibrium level of GDP? What is the multiplier? Same information as in the previous question: The following are exogenous (not directly affected by income): G = 11 I = 4 X = M = 0 The consumption function is: C = k + cY, where k = 3, c = 0.8 Imagine the maximum potential output or real GDP of this economy is 100. Assume that is the same as saying we reach the edge of the PPF at 100. Now assume we want to get that economy from the current level of GDP to its maximum potential of 100. We can do this in two ways - either increase government spending (G) or reduce taxes, (we…
The following question relates only to the equilibrium in the goods market IN A CLOSED ECONOMY and asks you to carry out a graphical analysis using both the Keynesian cross diagram together with the IS-MP diagram a) Suppose the goods market is initially in equilibrium. Suppose the government wants to implement a reduction in the overall level of taxation. What is the effect on output, consumption, investment and interest rates of this tax reduction? Explain and illustrate graphically your answer using both the Keynesian cross diagram in combination with the IS-MP diagram.
Consider two hypothetical economies that are perfectly similar except for their marginal propensity to consume (MPC). Each economy is currently in equilibrium with real income and planned expenditure equal to $100 billion, as given by the black points (plus signs) on the following two graphs. Assume that both economies are closed to trade, and that neither economy has taxes that change with income. The graphs also plot the 45-degree line. The first economy has an MPC equal to 0.5. Therefore, its initial planned expenditure line has a slope of 0.5 and passes through the point (100, 100). The second economy has an MPC equal to 0.75. Therefore, its initial planned expenditure line has a slope of 0.75 and passes through the point (100, 100). Now, suppose there is an increase of $20 billion in planned investment in each economy. In the first economy (with MPC = 0.5), the $20 billion increase in planned investment causes equilibrium income to increase by billion. In the second…
The levels of real disposable income and aggregate expenditures for an economy are given in the following table. -- Use the blue points (circle symbol) to plot the expenditures line for this economy on the following graph. Line segments will automatically connect the points. The black line represents the 45-degree line, where aggregate expenditures equal real GDP. Use the black point (plus symbol) to indicate equilibrium real GDP. - - In the previous graph, if the economy produces at an output level that is higher than equilibrium GDP, then the economy is in because aggregate expenditures are real GDP, and unplanned inventory investment is Read GDP (Y) Aggregate Expenditures (AE) (Trillions of dollars per year) (Trillions of dollars per year) 0 1 1 1.75 2 2.5 3 3.25 4 4 5 4.75 6 5.5 7 6.25 8 7 Use the blue points (circle symbol) to plot the expenditures line for this economy on the following graph. Line segments will automatically connect the points. The black line represents the…
You are provided with the following information about an imaginary economy called Keynesia: Government expenditure 400 Exports 250 Autonomous imports 50 Autonomous consumption 150 Investment expenditure 300 Full- employment output 1900 Marginal propensity to consume 0.75 Marginal propensity to import 0.15 Tax rate 0.25 Required (I) Derive the IS equation (ii) Derive the savings function (iii) Calculate the equilibrium level of income using the aggregate expenditure approach. (iv) What would the value of income be if the trade balance is zero? (v) What would the value of income be if autonomous consumption increases by 50
It appears that there was an economic drop during the 2019-2021 period as a result of the pandemic. Assume that we can view this as a negative shock to private investment, due to a combination of lockdowns and uncertainty about the world. In under 150 words, answer the following question: Was government consumption expenditure used as stabilisation policy following the slow-down during 2020 and 2021? (Note, you only need to discuss this in terms of our demand model of Income-Expenditure, IS-MPR, and Aggregate Demand.) Year Government consumption per capita ($) (rounded to a whole number) 2003 6672 2004 6820 2005 7016 2006 7394 2007 7515 2008 7757 2009 8040 2010 7892 2011 7931 2012 7969 2013 7955 2014 8041 2015 8154 2016 8124 2017 8096 2018 8238 2019 8371 2020 8658 2021 9207 2022 9962
Due to an increase in consumer wealth, there is a $40 billion autonomous increase in consumer spending in the economies of Westlandia and Eastlandia. Assuming that the aggregate price level is constant, the interest rate is fixed in both countries, and there are no taxes and no foreign trade, complete the accompanying tables to show the various rounds of increased spending that will occur in both economies if the marginal propensity to consume is 0.5 in Westlandia and 0.75 in Eastlandia. What do your results indicate about the relationship between the size of the marginal propensity to consume and the multiplier?
Use the Keynesian Model to answer this set of questions. Suppose that in the economy under consideration the consumption function can be written as C=200+.8(Y-T). Furthermore, you know that taxes are autonomous and equal to $10. Now, suppose that investment spending is equal to $50 at every level of disposable income and government spending is constant and equal to $100 at every level of disposable income, suppose that (X-M) is constant and equal to $20 at every level of disposable income. (a)Draw a graph of the consumption function with respect to disposable income. Measure/show consumption spending on the vertical axis and disposable income on the horizontal axis (b) Calculate equilibrium national income Y, from the information given. (c) From the information given above is the government running a deficit or surplus budget? Explain why. (d) Full employment output in this economy (Y) is equal to $2000 what do you predict is happening to inventories if the full employment level of…
Suppose that the marginal propensity to consume is 0.75. If the government decreases spending by Ksh 500 billion, what is the change in output? If the government decreases taxes by Ksh 500 billion, what is the change in (ii) output? If the government decreases transfer payments by ksh 500 billion, what is the change in output If the government decreases spending by ksh 500 billion and at the same time decreases taxes by ksh 500 billion, what is the change in output?