a. Based on PW method, Design Z is more economical. . The modified B/C ratio of Design Y is The modified B/C ration of Design Z is (Round to two decimal places) (Round to two decimal places) The incremental B/C ratio is (Round to two decimal places) Therefore, based on the B/C ratio method, Design Z is more economical Investment cost Annual revenue Annual cost Useful life Salvage value Net PW Design Y $140,000 $57,659 $17,618 15 years $14,700 $135,399 Design Z $275,000 $96,354 $31,687 15 years $33,000 $171,467
a. Based on PW method, Design Z is more economical. . The modified B/C ratio of Design Y is The modified B/C ration of Design Z is (Round to two decimal places) (Round to two decimal places) The incremental B/C ratio is (Round to two decimal places) Therefore, based on the B/C ratio method, Design Z is more economical Investment cost Annual revenue Annual cost Useful life Salvage value Net PW Design Y $140,000 $57,659 $17,618 15 years $14,700 $135,399 Design Z $275,000 $96,354 $31,687 15 years $33,000 $171,467
Chapter2: Productions Possibilities, Opportunity Costs, And Economic Growth
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 17SQ
Related questions
Question
Expert Solution
Step by step
Solved in 9 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you