A sample of small cars was selected, and the values of x = horsepower and y estimated regression equation ŷ = 53.0 - 0.180x. (a) How would you interpret b = -0.180? = fuel efficiency (mpg) were determined for each car. Fitting the simple linear regression model gave the For each one-unit increase in horsepower the predicted fuel efficiency decreases by 0.180 mpg. For each one-unit increase in mpg the predicted horsepower increases by 0.180 horsepower. For each one-unit decrease in mpg the predicted horsepower decreases by 0.180 horsepower. For each one-unit increase in horsepower the predicted fuel efficiency increases by 0.180 mpg. For each one-unit increase in mpg the predicted horsepower decreases by 0.180 horsepower. (b) Substituting x = 100 gives ŷ = 35. Give two different interpretations of this number. (Select all that apply.) An estimate of the horsepower when the fuel efficiency is 100. A prediction for the fuel efficiency of a car whose horsepower is 35. A prediction for the fuel efficiency of a car whose horsepower is 100. An estimate of the mean fuel efficiency when the horsepower is 35. An estimate of the mean fuel efficiency when the horsepower is 100. (c) What is the predicted efficiency for a car with a 300-horsepower engine? = Why do you think this has occurred? This result is valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for the small cars used in the sample. This result cannot be valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for the small cars used in the sample. This result is valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for a car. This result cannot be valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for a car. (d) Interpret r² = 0.690 in the context of this problem. This tells us that 69.0% of the variation in horsepower is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency. This tells us that 31.0% of the variation in fuel efficiency is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency. This tells us that 69.0% of the variation in fuel efficiency is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency. This tells us that 31.0% of the variation in horsepower is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency. (e) Interpret s = 2.0 in the context of this problem. e This tells us that 2 mpg is a typical average of the fuel efficiency of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line. This tells us that 2 horsepower is a typical deviation of the horsepower of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line. This tells us that 2 mpg is a typical deviation of the fuel efficiency of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line. This tells us that 2 mpg is a typical deviation of the horsepower of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line. This tells us that 2 horsepower is a typical average of the horsepower of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line.

Calculus For The Life Sciences
2nd Edition
ISBN:9780321964038
Author:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Chapter2: Exponential, Logarithmic, And Trigonometric Functions
Section2.CR: Chapter 2 Review
Problem 111CR: Respiratory Rate Researchers have found that the 95 th percentile the value at which 95% of the data...
icon
Related questions
Question

13.1.2

A sample of small cars was selected, and the values of x = horsepower and y
estimated regression equation ŷ
= 53.0 - 0.180x.
(a) How would you interpret b
= -0.180?
=
fuel efficiency (mpg) were determined for each car. Fitting the simple linear regression model gave the
For each one-unit increase in horsepower the predicted fuel efficiency decreases by 0.180 mpg.
For each one-unit increase in mpg the predicted horsepower increases by 0.180 horsepower.
For each one-unit decrease in mpg the predicted horsepower decreases by 0.180 horsepower.
For each one-unit increase in horsepower the predicted fuel efficiency increases by 0.180 mpg.
For each one-unit increase in mpg the predicted horsepower decreases by 0.180 horsepower.
(b) Substituting x = 100 gives ŷ = 35. Give two different interpretations of this number. (Select all that apply.)
An estimate of the horsepower when the fuel efficiency is 100.
A prediction for the fuel efficiency of a car whose horsepower is 35.
A prediction for the fuel efficiency of a car whose horsepower is 100.
An estimate of the mean fuel efficiency when the horsepower is 35.
An estimate of the mean fuel efficiency when the horsepower is 100.
(c) What is the predicted efficiency for a car with a 300-horsepower engine?
=
Why do you think this has occurred?
This result is valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for the small cars used in the sample.
This result cannot be valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for the small cars used in the sample.
This result is valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for a car.
This result cannot be valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for a car.
Transcribed Image Text:A sample of small cars was selected, and the values of x = horsepower and y estimated regression equation ŷ = 53.0 - 0.180x. (a) How would you interpret b = -0.180? = fuel efficiency (mpg) were determined for each car. Fitting the simple linear regression model gave the For each one-unit increase in horsepower the predicted fuel efficiency decreases by 0.180 mpg. For each one-unit increase in mpg the predicted horsepower increases by 0.180 horsepower. For each one-unit decrease in mpg the predicted horsepower decreases by 0.180 horsepower. For each one-unit increase in horsepower the predicted fuel efficiency increases by 0.180 mpg. For each one-unit increase in mpg the predicted horsepower decreases by 0.180 horsepower. (b) Substituting x = 100 gives ŷ = 35. Give two different interpretations of this number. (Select all that apply.) An estimate of the horsepower when the fuel efficiency is 100. A prediction for the fuel efficiency of a car whose horsepower is 35. A prediction for the fuel efficiency of a car whose horsepower is 100. An estimate of the mean fuel efficiency when the horsepower is 35. An estimate of the mean fuel efficiency when the horsepower is 100. (c) What is the predicted efficiency for a car with a 300-horsepower engine? = Why do you think this has occurred? This result is valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for the small cars used in the sample. This result cannot be valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for the small cars used in the sample. This result is valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for a car. This result cannot be valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for a car.
(d) Interpret r²
= 0.690 in the context of this problem.
This tells us that 69.0% of the variation in horsepower is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency.
This tells us that 31.0% of the variation in fuel efficiency is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency.
This tells us that 69.0% of the variation in fuel efficiency is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency.
This tells us that 31.0% of the variation in horsepower is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency.
(e) Interpret s = 2.0 in the context of this problem.
e
This tells us that 2 mpg is a typical average of the fuel efficiency of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line.
This tells us that 2 horsepower is a typical deviation of the horsepower of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line.
This tells us that 2 mpg is a typical deviation of the fuel efficiency of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line.
This tells us that 2 mpg is a typical deviation of the horsepower of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line.
This tells us that 2 horsepower is a typical average of the horsepower of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line.
Transcribed Image Text:(d) Interpret r² = 0.690 in the context of this problem. This tells us that 69.0% of the variation in horsepower is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency. This tells us that 31.0% of the variation in fuel efficiency is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency. This tells us that 69.0% of the variation in fuel efficiency is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency. This tells us that 31.0% of the variation in horsepower is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency. (e) Interpret s = 2.0 in the context of this problem. e This tells us that 2 mpg is a typical average of the fuel efficiency of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line. This tells us that 2 horsepower is a typical deviation of the horsepower of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line. This tells us that 2 mpg is a typical deviation of the fuel efficiency of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line. This tells us that 2 mpg is a typical deviation of the horsepower of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line. This tells us that 2 horsepower is a typical average of the horsepower of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
Algebra and Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)
Algebra and Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305071742
Author:
James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
College Algebra
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781938168383
Author:
Jay Abramson
Publisher:
OpenStax
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)
Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)
Trigonometry
ISBN:
9781305652224
Author:
Charles P. McKeague, Mark D. Turner
Publisher:
Cengage Learning