preview

Traditional Budgeting : Is It Is Preferred By Analysts Over The Traditional Form Of Budgeting

Decent Essays

As the corporate world evolves and transforms over the previous couple of years, there is a greater need to switch to more efficient and quicker methods to boost performance. Traditional budgeting has often been condemned as a slow, time-utilizing and expensive form of accounting procedure that does little to achieve the demands of our progressive era. New methods and models have been derived to keep up with the ever changing world we live in. Most accounting financialists have recommended that organizations switch from traditional budgeting to beyond budgeting. This business report will discuss what beyond budgeting is and why it is preferred by analysts over the traditional form of budgeting. Furthermore, it will also present a case for traditional budgeting by detailing its strengths and weaknesses.

Discussion and Findings
Traditional budgeting, according to Drury (2009), is a once in a year tradition where managers representing each department come together and draw up a total budget for the organization which details the cost that would be incurred for the upcoming year. Drury further goes on to claim how traditional budgeting has, on numerous occasions, been termed as inflexible and unpredictable as it is purely based on assumptions and speculations. A traditional budget lists incomes, subtracts expenses and then makes final adjustments to the budget. A study conducted by Bourne, Neely and Heyns (2002) on a number of companies that use traditional budgeting show that

Get Access