The Government Of Canada Occupational Health And Safety Essay

Employers have duties under health and safety law to assess risks in the workplace. Risk assessments should be carried out that address all risks that might cause harm in the workplace. Employers must give employees information about the risks in their workplace and how they are protected, also instruct and train their employees on how to deal with the risks. Employers must consult employees on health and safety issues. Consultation must be either direct or through a safety representative that is either elected by the workforce or appointed by a trade union. It is an employees duty to take reasonable care of their own health and safety. If possible avoid wearing jewellery or loose clothing if operating machinery. If the employee has long hair or wears a headscarf, make sure it's tucked out of the way (it could get caught in machinery). To take reasonable care not to put other people such as fellow employees and members of the public at risk by what they do or don't do in the course of their work. To co-operate with the employer, making sure the employee gets proper training and the employee understands and follows the company's health and safety policies. Not to interfere with or misuse anything that's been provided for their health, safety or welfare. To report any injuries, strains or illnesses they suffer as a result of doing their job (the employer may need to change the way they work). To tell their employer if something

State why and when health and safety control equipment, identified by the principles of protection, should be used relating to types, purpose and limitations of each type, the work situation, occupational use and the general work environment, in relation to:

The employer has a responsibility to follow the regulation which is known as the ‘Health and Safety at Work Act 1974’. This is An Act to make further provision for securing the health, safety and

In the workplace employees need to put these safe ways of working into practice; for

All people have the right to be protected from work related risks. The Health and Safety Act “set the standards that must be met to ensure the health

Health & Safety At Work Etc. Act 1974 (HASAWA)Employers have a general duty to ensure the health, safety and welfare at work of all employees so far as is reasonably practicable.Management of Health & Safety at Work Regulations 1999Employers have a legal duty to carry out risk assessments as the first step in ensuring a safe and healthy workplace. * A written record must be kept if there are 5 or more employees. * Preventive and protective measures must be

on employers to ensure the workplace is safe and suitable for the tasks being carried

Employers must always make sure that everyone’s health & safety is maintained at all times but they should also make sure that there organisation is up to relevant standards as everyone has the right to work in a safe secure work environment.

At Tosi Industries, both the employer and supervisors failed to ensure a safe workplace when the supervisor, Steve Timmins, threatened employees for refusing unsafe work (Tucker, 2008). The supervisor threatened the well-being of his employees by pressuring them into doing unsafe work. Steve intimidated the employees by threatening termination if his orders were disobeyed (Tucker, 2008). It is within an employee’s right to refuse unusually dangerous work until there has been reasonable steps to fix the problem or until an occupational health inspector reviews the situation and advises the worker otherwise (OHS s. 3-32

The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), often referred to as the "OSH Act," was enacted in 1970 by President Richard M. Nixon. Its purpose is to assure safe and healthful working conditions for men and women (EPA, 2006). The Act is administered and enforced at the national level by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, a division of the US Department of Labor. The application of the OSH Act in the current employment climate will be discussed as it applies to a variety of industries; considerations that are most applicable to the specific type of industry will be discussed initially, and those that are equally important regardless of the type of business will complete the section. Finally, this paper will discuss how the

“Everyone has the right to a safe workplace. The law requires employers to provide their employees with working conditions that are free of known dangers. Employers MUST provide their employees with a workplace that does not have serious hazards and follow all relevant OSHA safety and health standards. You cannot be transferred, denied a raise, have your hours reduced, be fired, or punished in any other way because you used any right given to you under the OSHA Act.”

- The right to refuse - If you have been chosen to handle unsafe work, you have the right to refuse it. As an employee/worker, you don't have to do something you think is unsafe if it is not a part of your job. By choosing to do work that is dangerous, safety precautions must be followed.

This responsibility motivates the HR department and managers to implement stringent policies to prevent work-related injuries to avoid paying for higher workers’ compensation insurance. Moreover, it inspires the company to promote safety by organizing a safety committee to address hazards in the workplace to prevent injuries or deaths. The committee solicits employee suggestions and participation to increase compliance to company policies. It also develops various safety programs to promote employee wellness to improve their quality of life (Gomez-Mejia, et al, 2010).

Employers spend thousands of dollars to ensure workplace safety. However when an accident occurs, and company production and sales are at stake, many overlook operational best practices in business ethics. Today, companies are greatly impacted by societies evolvultion toward a “good” place for everyone diverse in culture, religion, and socioeconomic background. This trajectory drives social changes, activists, and theorists who believe attaining “the good” is worth pursuing and has no boundaries. As Aristotle noted, the end goals of political and individual well-being are justice and happiness (Collins 2015). In examining the “Trouble in the Truss Construction Shop” case study, a pragmatic approach was used to ethically formulate possible remedies to the company’s issue with employee safety.

Injuries and fatality are not unusual to workplace. In Australia, although the rate of workers got injured and involved in fatalities (commonly in construction industry), are decreasing each year, yet, it is still high to not to deny. Based on the statistic released by Safe Work Australia [1], as at 8th August 2014, 109 Australian have been killed during working and the number is expecting to increase by the end of this year. In fact, every 2-3 minutes, an Australian is seriously injured [2] while at work. As clarified by Safe Work Australia itself, the number worker deaths and injuries