preview

The Comparison Between 'Mortal Kombat And' Grand Stand-In

Better Essays

As humans, we are prone to evaluating everything, from the way our hair looks to the food that we eat. Evaluation also implies when reading literature books, novels and in this case short stories. According to the Dictionary of Literary Terms, a short story is, “A relatively short narrative (under 1,000 words) which is designed to produce a single dominant effect and which contains the elements of drama” (Shaw 343). When reading I tend to let my imagination take over and place me in the book with the characters. That is why I chose “Mortal Kombat” and “Grand Stand-In” by Kevin Wilson’s Tunneling to the center to the Earth to evaluate. With these two stories I will use the exposition, conflict, and resolution to help critique which one was more worth reading. Stated by the Dictionary of Literary Terms, an exposition is, “Applied to the beginning of the portion of a *plot in which back ground information is set forth” (Shaw 150). The exposition is basically the first few paragraphs of a story. To me a healthy exposition is very detailed. Personally, when reading knowing the main characters and setting are the two main things I tend to look for; not knowing this information can be risky and cause readers to be unentertained and stop reading the story. In the short story “Grand Stand-In,” the character goes right into telling her background story. Within the first few paragraphs she states, “I never had a family of my own. I didn’t get married, couldn’t see the use of it. […] I

Get Access