Nadira A Quraishi
Submitted to-Tracy Blackwell
PSI Report part 2
26th Jan 2011
Incident Report
Date of incident: 06/04/2009 Time: 12.30 PM
Name of the defendant: John Doe
Address: 2804 Emil ct, Woodbridge, VA 22191
Phone Number(s): 586-765-7896
Date of birth: 12/03/1987 male: √ Female ___
Name of injured person: Jonathan Douglas
Details of incident: Defendant and his friend went to the same store where he was arrested previously for shoplifting. He threw a beverage to the security’s face and slapped him. Defendant got really angry when he saw the security. Defendant thinks he was responsible for his arrest in the past because the security caught him for shoplifting. As the defendant is
…show more content…
WHERFORE, the offender’s officer prays the Court revoke the offender’s probation and enter a dispositional order.
Tim Peyton Probation Officer
SUPERIOR COURT OF VIRGINIA
COUNTY OF PRINCE WILLIAM
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA NOTICE OF PROBATION
John Doe VIOLATION AND COURT ACTION
--------------------------------------
Defendant
TO THE JURGE OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT:
On the day of 2nd March, 2009, the above-named defendant was granted twelve months supervised probation for the crime of violation of Section 18.2-96 as a Class 1 misdemeanor of the Virginia Penal Code.
ALLEGED VIOLATIONS:
Terms of the probation violated:
1. Defendant shell obeys all laws.
2. Defendant shell complies with the instruction of the probation officer.
3. Defendant shell totally stay out of the alcoholic beverage
4. Defendant shell not uses any non-prescribed control substance.
5. Defendant shell not traffic in control substance.
6. Defendant shell enters and successfully complete family therapy program, at his own expense as directed by the probation officer.
Violated probation as followed:
Defendant was in twelve months supervised probation and he was
Darren DelPapa is a sixteen year old male who is currently on courtesy probation supervision in Portsmouth, for charges that occurred in Chesapeake. Charges before the Chesapeake Juvenile and Domestic Relations court were possession of drug paraphernalia, amended from possession of a controlled substance and a curfew citation. The charges were taken under advisement for a period of one year, and Darren was allowed to enroll in the Commonwealth Challenge program in Virginia Beach. He was ordered onto probation, at any time he was not in the Commonwealth Challenge program. Program requirements of the Commonwealth Challenge program do not allow individuals to be on probation as a condition of entry, hence the order of the court. Darren
“The Prison and Probation Service has two main goals: To contribute to the reduction of criminality, and to work to increase safety in society. To achieve these goals we work with sentenced persons in order to improve their possibilities of living a life without committing new crimes.” (Linstrom and Leijonram)
Eating disorders are characterised by an abnormal attitude towards food that causes an individual to change their eating habits and their behaviour. There are several types of eating disorders that can effect an individual physically, psychologically and socially. The two eating disorders which I will be discussing is anorexia and bulimia.
Title: An investigation into the impact of group pressure on an individual’s estimate of the amount of beads in a pot (ginger granules in a jar).
, I believe they Both noticed a hearing are required before the probation revocation, and the probationer should have the opportunity for representation by the counsel before a prison sentence is imposed. Petitioner Mempa pled guilty for joyriding. He was sentenced to two years’ probation on the condition that he spend 30 days in jail and the sentence be deferred. Four months later, the Spokane County prosecutor moved to have the petitioner’s probation revoked because he had been involved in a burglary during his
On 05/24/2018 at approximately 1830 hours, I, Deputy A. Martinez Vazquez (117015) responded to (Boys Town) 1415 Flanagan Ln., Oviedo, Seminole County, FL., in reference to a battery over with. I was notified that the battery was between two juveniles a 12 and 17 year old and both juveniles were separated at the time. When I arrived, I spoke with Javaro Rooks an employee of the institution at Boys Town who stated that Javarius Deloach (B/M DOB:12/06/2001) hit another juvenile, Gres Jr. Robinson (B/M DOB:03/07/2006), in the back of the neck by with an open palm. Javaro told me that the incident happened at the basketball court behind the residence.
rogress: On 2/6/17 CPSW received an email from Ms. Messerli's probation officer reporting that Ms. Messerli has not remained law abiding and she has not remained sober. Ms. Messerli was no show to her PO appointment and she did not stay sober. Ms. Messerli has an appointment with her probation on 2/8/17. The probation officer reported that if Ms. Messerli is a no show again to her appointment, she will issue a probation violation for 1). Failing to meet with probation, 2). Failing to complete a Rule 25, 3). Failing to remain law-abiding 4). Failing to remain
The defendant’s attorney argued that this was his first drug charge and stated that the defendant was indeed eligible under Virginia law to receive first offender status. The first offender program included a decision that the judge would withhold for one year. It also included that the defendant, was to serve 100 hours of community service, be subject to random drug tests, and was to wave his 4th Amendment rights of unreasonable searches and seizures for one year. The judge then asked to hear his prior criminal record. The attorney then representing the Commonwealth of Virginia began to list a long list of incidents, which included; Breaking and entering, and grand larceny in 2003, assault and battery in 2004, and a D.U.I. with a failure to appear in court in 2012. After hearing a longer list than stated above, the judge stated “I think I have heard enough. It seems to me that you are trying to obtain first offender status to avoid another conviction.” The defense began to argue that the defendant at the time he was stopped on his moped was heading to one of his three jobs. The judge stated, “I assume he was using the moped due to his D.U.I.” in which the answer was “yes”. The judge then asked the attorney for the Commonwealth of Virginia to present his argument, in which he surprisingly stated that overall in the defendants circumstances he was “trying to do the right thing” by having three jobs and working hard. The judge interjected and
Laurie Weinfeld (Appellee) lives and operates a party center next to Mr. and Mrs. Weinfeld (Appellants). One evening a rock was thrown through the party center window. Ms. Weinfeld distributed flyers offering a reward for information regarding the perpetrator who vandalized her business. The flyers were distributed in the residing neighborhood, the school where the Welling’s’ son attended, and the workplace of the Welling’s.
COMES NOW the Defendant, Josue Emmanuel Rivera-Lemus, by and through counsel, Vernida R. Chaney, and pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Section 6A1. 2 the United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual (“U.S.S.G.” or the “Guidelines”), United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), United States v. Hughes, 401 F.3d 540 (4th Cir. 2005), and this Court’s Policy Regarding Procedure to be followed in Sentencing, represents that he has reviewed the Probation Office’s Presentence Investigation Report and submits the Defendant’s Position with Respect to Sentencing to aid the Court in determining an appropriate sentence.
The offender was Court ordered to comply with the Justice Related Service Plan. At the time of this report, his case remains active with Justice Related Services, nonetheless; Justice Related Services has not not had contact with the offender since December of 2016 after several attempts to contact the offender at his reported phone number of (412) 351-0403. Therefore, the offender has not been able to take advantage of the services offered by Justice Related Services.
The first reason that judges utilize probation is that it allows a greater focus towards the offender’s successful reintegration into society. Furthermore, probation alleviates the social exile effect that incarceration brings, and allows them contact with peer support outside the system. Subsequently, probation is normally cheaper than incarceration and appears equally effective in the rehabilitation of offenders. Finally, probation tends to meet the fairness goal in sentencing for non-violent offenders. Yet, the use of probation also has its own
Mead & Hampson (1996) developed a study involving the divided visual field paradigm and a phonological rhyme/non-rhyme task to test the speed and accurateness of either side of the brain. This study was used to investigate functional asymmetry between the left and right hemispheres in phonological processing. The research was taken out equally on 15 male and 15 females London Metropolitan University students ranging from ages 18 – 35 years old. They were all specifically chosen to be right–handed and had English as their first language thus providing a fair experiment to see whether our left hemisphere (left side of the brain) or the right hemisphere is faster and more accurate. In conclusion using the mean and standard
A crucial part of the criminal justice system includes probation. Probation is the release of a criminal offender from detention or incarceration. At this time, the offender is subject to a period of good behavior under supervision. Probation is also referred to a kind of punishment that is giving as part of sentencing. Instead of giving an offender a longer sentence, a judge will order the defendant to report to their assigned probation officer on a regular basis, where the offender will receive a schedule instructing him or her of their probation requirements. If the defendant does not obey a probation order, the defendant will automatically return to jail or to court, only to be given a longer sentence by the judge. A person on probation is not allowed to leave the judicial district without permission of the probation officer or court (Seiter, 2011). The probationer shall report to the probation officer as directed and shall submit truthful and complete reports (Seiter, 2011). A person on probation must also follow all directions instructed by his or her probation officer truthfully. When on probation, an offender must obtain employment and needs to notify his or her probation officer of all changes of address within a three-day limit. The probationer shall also refrain from the excessive use of alcohol
I knocked on the front door and the victim, later identified as John Firby, answered the door. I identified myself as a police officer and asked John what had happened. John told me, in summary, that his wife, later identified as Lolla Firby, had slapped him three times on the right side of his face face during an argument in the living room. I noticed John had a cut to the right side of his lip that he told me he had sustained from being slapped by Lolla. John also noted he