Part I: Zoot Suit, by Luis Valdez, is a musical drama that follows the events of Henry Reyna and his 38th Street Gang in their pursuit to prove their innocence after being accused of a murder they did not commit. Set in Los Angeles, during a time marked by racial conflict between whites and Chicanos, Henry and his gang encounter a prejudiced judicial system that wanted nothing more than to lock them away. Initially, in the beginning scene of the film, I was confused by the role Pachuco played, for he possessed a supernatural ability to pause time. As the film continued, Pachuco continued to use his ability to manipulate the conscience, and ultimately the actions, of Henry. This unique power and its influence on the plot not only made the movie …show more content…
To me, a good actor/actress is one that can make me believe that they are experiencing the events that are unfolding for the characters. One of the main factors that help to create a great storyline, such as Zoot Suit’s, are the actors/actresses. For instance, a movie can have a compelling story, phenomenal music and camera work; however, it is ultimately left up to the actors’ performances to generate a positive experience for the film’s viewers. What pulled me into the film were the songs and the manner in which the movie was executed. Rather than have the singing be solely in English, which likely would have appeased his largely English-speaking audience, Valdez implemented a Spanish-style musical theme that included Spanish lyrics. “‘Cause the Zoot Suit is the style in California. También en Colorado y Arizona. They’re wearing that tacuche en el paso y en todos los salones de Chicago” (Burrell et al.) is an example. I believe Valdez’s purpose was to remind the audience of his culture’s pride, and highlight the message that it is his people, the Latinos, that are enduring attacks on their …show more content…
For instance, although reading made it easier to comprehend the story, for I could read at my own pace, the written text did not do the characters or the music justice in depicting the intensity and true emotions (which drew me into the film) that ran throughout the story. As a result, I did not have as great of a response reading it, compared to watching the film. I did have to look up a few Chicano Spanish words, but for the most part, Valdez formulated his play in a way that a reader, unfamiliar with the language, could still follow the events of the story. I feel the reason Valdez intersperses Spanish and English together is to demonstrate to the audience that the languages, and ultimately the people, have the ability to commingle. For instance, in the first scene of the movie, Pachuco chants, “Como los pachucones down in L.A. Where huisas in their pompadours look real keen on the dance floor of the ballrooms donde bailan swing” and “He’s a man. Es hombre” (Burrell et al.). This action, and the twist at the end of the story, is what pulled me into the play. Originally, I was convinced the story would end with the main character living happily ever after, which would have been cliche; however, I am pleasantly surprised at how Valdez implemented the different possibilities Henry’s life could have ended, and that it is ultimately left up to the reader to decide which
Through the use of pathos, schemes, and tropes, Rodriquez offers his conflicting feelings about California and Mexico. By contrasting Mexico and California with these styles of writing, he sets up
On the one hand, English was the language used to communicate with outsiders. It was a tool for survival and held no personal meaning. It was crucial for public success. On the other hand, in Richard Rodriguez’s own words: “Spanish was associated with closeness”. By reading the previous passage, we can clearly infer that Spanish was the key to Richard’s confort. Hearing Spanish brought Rodriguez feelings of love, acceptance, family, and security. Spanish was a reminder of home and seemed to him a private language. In other words, he was surrounded by a web built by the family love and security which is conveyed by using the Spanish language, as the following passage shows: “...Spanish seemed to me the language of home...It became the language of joyful return...”. Moreover, if we consider the following passage:”You belong here. We are family members. Related. Special to one another” it is possible to say that Spanish language made Rodriguez felt as part of his family, creating a feeling of belonging and reinforcing family ties and ethnic heritage.
Rodriguez offers a different standpoint on bilingualism, and an argument he presents is that one must be willing to give up part of their native ways when learning a language to fit into the public. Rodriguez considered Spanish a private language and English a public one. This perception made him reluctant to learn English, but at the same time, it motivated him to become a part of the public by learning its language. Rodriguez uses his family life as an example of his native identity. He was not an English speaker when he was young, but upon learning the language, he drifted away from his family, and describes it rather frankly: “I was an American citizen. But the special feeling of closeness at home was diminished by then. . . . No longer so close; no longer bound tight by the pleasing and troubling knowledge of our public separateness . . . . When I arrived home there would often be
As a young child, Rodriguez finds comfort and safety in his noisy home full of Spanish sounds. Spanish, is his family's' intimate language that comforts Rodriguez by surrounding him in a web built by the family love and security which is conveyed using the Spanish language. "I recognize you as someone close, like no one outside. You
The film brings the viewer forward in time to 1959 with Santana as a young man of 16 growing up in the barrios with his friends and fellow gang members Mundo and JD. After being arrested and sent to juvenile hall, Santana has his “manhood” taken from him on the first night and murders the man who sodomized him. The power and respect that killing this man brought from his peers was intoxicating; his act also brought him a long prison sentence.
By contrast, Richard Rodriquez, in his article entitled "Aria", strongly believes in surrendering to learning the proper English language, despite how strongly he feels his native tongue is a private language that once functioned to unite his family. Rodriguez creates a division of a public and a private discourse. He feels that he has a right to learn the public language of los gringos'. He creates a visual clash of two worlds: a public world as represented by school and the need to learn English; and a private world as represented by his family and the use of Spanish within the home. He feels that in order to adapt and create assimilation that he needs to abandon the comfort of using Spanish to communicate and force himself to learn English even if it meant alienating his family members.
They are Mexican-American. Their equality rights do not accept in America society. They and their family always spend the life by examining of American government. Henry Reyna, El Pachuco, the Navy during the World War II. He is the young Mexican-American generation. He lives in the South Central Los Angeles, California. They are a mythical figure, a rebellious, street-smart, young Chicano. They make up their hair style. He dresses a long jacket, a baggy trousers, and a lengthy watch chain. He and his people dance with their girlfriends. They wear the zoot suit, the big pride of Mexican-American about the Mexican male, they make the belief to the rebellious generation for the equality rights struggling. Henry and his gang are the antagonist characters to serve the holistic of the world. He kills the murder, help the media, and fed their headline by the police (Scene 1, Act 5, page). Luis Valdez success to create the danger of the character, El Pachuco is in to Henry and the opposite. The riots break out in the streets. the zoot suiters are targeted, the suspects stripped by sailors and marines based on the racism, the discrimination profile. The author is successful to describe the press, the media communication. The laws use the name to disguise discriminate. They create the dangerous situation for their ruse. Their
Following her father’s view, the next four stanzas describes Espaillat’s different view on bilingualism. “English outside this door, Spanish inside,” / he said, “y basta.” But who can divide // the world, the word ( mundo y palabra) from / any child? I knew how to be dumb // and stubborn (testaruda); late, in bed, / I hoarded secret syllables I read // until my tongue (mi lengua) learned to run / where his stumbled. And still the heart was one” (lis 7-14). Here, she complains about her father’s rule of separating english and spanish from her household. Using a rhetorical question, she states that it is impossible to separate an exposed language from a child. Secretly practicing english in her father’s absence, she was able to fluently learn the language which her father struggled in. Through her success, Espaillat saw that her heart was “still” one, which is a metaphor for saying that the two language can coexist; contradicting her father’s view on the “cut” of her heart in two.
Racial tensions began heightening in the city of Los Angeles on June of 1943. It’s what came to be known as the Zoot Suit Riots. Racial tension between Mexican Americans who were called both pachucos and zoot suiters. They were known for their fashion which had a symbolic meaning towards them, it was a way in expressing themselves which white sailors and servicemen disliked. They saw Mexican Americans as thugs, gang members, and delinquents. White servicemen and sailors were unfamiliar with hispanics, but it was so easy for them to discriminate by appearance. Several Mexican Americans served in white units. Tension was rising between them, especially when marines and sailors assaulted both Mexican and African Americans in their own neighborhood. Also, for a false rumor towards Mexican Americans which stated that they had attacked and stabbed a sailor. Both races were being discriminated and were treated unjustly. The day came on June 3, 1943 where these conflicts led to the Zoot Suit Riots. This incident of violence lasted a whole week. Zoot suiters were beaten and arrested for no reason at all. The issues that led to the Zoot Suits in 1943 was Jose Diaz, the Sleepy Lagoon Case, and racial attacks between whites and people of color. This filled the atmosphere with a lot of hatred and discrimination that had erupted in the summer of 1943. The riot led to a compromise of all military personnel being banned from the city limits with in Los Angeles
The first play that we are looking at, Fences ,and Zoot Suit plays, I’ve chosen is multiculturalism. This is not the biggest part of the view in of these plays, the specific theme of the ethnic groups by El Pachuco in the Zoot Suit and the conflict of generations
Sabina Berman is a notable and critically acclaimed Mexican playwright. Berman’s notable work includes her first published play, Yankee (1979). In Adam Versényi’s translation of Yankee, Berman explores the relationship between the individual and identity. Through the three main characters—Bill, Alberto, and Rosa—we see the continual conflict they face as they aspire to achieve their respective objectives: to feel nurtured and loved, to have peace and quiet, and to feel loved and acknowledged. But it is Berman’s interjection of juxtapositions that forces us to analyze the relationship between the main characters. More specifically, Berman focuses on the impact Bill has as an intruder, and how he highlights the national identity incompatibilities between North American and Mexican cultures, to expose the serious social and political problems between the nations.
There are multiple topics that are embedded in Cervantes book, Emplumada. Most of the topics deal with the trials and tribulations of having a misconnection with her own culture. The topics I will be analyzing about are how Cervantes tries to resolve her own sense of split identity--Mexican and American--through her poetry in “Emplumada.” The poems I chose from Emplumada are, “Beneath the Shadow of the Freeway,” “Refugee Ship” and “Oaxaca, 1974”. I will begin with an analysis of each poem, the interpretations of the three sections in the book, and will conclude with Cervantes resolutions in her split identity. After doing a thorough analysis of the poems, I hope to have a better understanding of how Cervantes found her identity.
Luis Valdez wrote “Los Vendidos” in order to address his view of the Mexican culture and in reference to the prejudices that surrounded him. The play defines four versions of Mexican men, shop owner Honest Sancho is trying to sell to a Secretary in Governor Reagan’s political office. The buildup of characters: The Farmworker, Johnny Pachuco, The Revolucionario, and the Mexican-American, symbolizes an evolution of what society deems the “ideal” Mexican-American should be. “Los Vendidos” translates to "The Sold Ones" or "The Sellouts” which is a solid interpretation of Valdez’s opinion on Mexican’s conformity to the American culture. Valdez creates a distinct characterization of all four models, Miss Jimenez, and Honest Sancho with snarky
The Zoot Suit play, Luis Valdez notices the in-depth look picture into the cultural struggling and the young generation by El Pachuco and his people. They are Mexican-American. Their equality rights do not accept in America society. They and their family always spend the life by examining of American government. Henry Reyna, El Pachuco, the Navy during the World War II. He is the young Mexican-American generation. He lives in the South Central Los Angeles, California. They are a mythical figure, a rebellious, street-smart, young Chicano. They make up their hair style. He dresses a long jacket, a baggy trousers, and a lengthy watch chain. He and his people dance with their girlfriends. They wear the zoot suit, the big pride of Mexican-American
Sandra Cisneros’ short story, “Never Marry a Mexican”, indirectly underlines her perspective, her interpretation, judgement, and critical evaluation of her subject, the work and its title. This perspective is evident in her use of literary devices, diction, and language structure in her narrative. The purpose of the use of these elements in the way that she does is ultimately linked to understanding her viewpoint on the subject. The author’s perspective is embedded in the meaning of the story and its theme. Her interpretations are valid, and justified in detail throughout the story to add color and vibrancy to her characters. Her judgment is lightly touched upon but only clearly and directly given at the end of the story, to allow the