Off-Duty Smoking 1. Was Rob’s choice justified? Why or why not? No, I don’t think Rob’s choice was justified. Rob did not hire this person because she was a smoker nor because she was less qualified. His reason for hiring her was, “Rob had to go with soft reasons. Cathy was a smoker. Rob didn’t like smoking – he considered it disgusting and a sign of weakness of character.” I feel as though Rob was being discriminative towards her. If Rob would have not hired Cathy because of something that she had said during the interview or because Jen had a few more “achievements” that stood out, then it would have been perfectly fine. He shouldn’t have judged her on smoking when both resumes were just alike and both interviews went well. 2. Is it …show more content…
There are people that abuse their “smoking privileges”. I personally hate smoking but as long as they don’t abuse their privileges on “smoking breaks” I would be okay with it. I can’t discriminate against anyone, because I know there are habits of my own that some people I’m sure hate as well. Then of course, the biggest question of all comes up: What about the people that don’t smoke? A smoker takes a five minute “smoke break”, while a non-smoker also is allowed a five minute “smoke break”. Everyone should be treated equally, with no exceptions. 4. Should employers be free not to hire employees whose personal behaviors are considered high risk? There is a difference between “high risk personal behaviors” and “personal behaviors that slow productivity”. High risk personal behaviors could range from: smoking to texting while driving. Personal behaviors are irrelevant as long as an employee can remain efficient for the company he or she is working for. If an employee is not working to his or her greatest effectiveness, then a real and legitimist reason has risen as to why this person should not have been hired in the first place. The challenge is: picking and choosing which people applying for the position, will do a better job after they are hired. 5. Should employers be able to resist employee’s high risk behavior? Why or why not? Putting a restriction on something is easy. Recommending and encouraging employees to not take part in these actions are the best
Public smoking has been an issue for people who do not take part in the smoking epidemic for as long as smoking has been around. What people need to understand is that individuals who do not engage in the activity of ruining their lungs are being forced into the act of involuntary smoking rather they like it or not, and that is unacceptable.
107). In this particular ethical dilemma, “healthcare workers who smoke are setting a terrible example and sending a very bad message to patients” (NHSEB, 2017, p. 7). This demonstrates that it does not appear to be a great example for the health professional to advise a patient against smoking, when the professional themselves are smokers. The theory of Utilitarianism would argue if patients are not allowed to smoke, it can be presumed that the expert staff members should not be allowed to smoke either. Generally speaking, there are typically more patients than there are workers, therefore making the non-smoking population larger than the smoking population. Allowing just the employees (who would be considered the minority in this situation) to smoke would create social status and health issues to those around the smoking employee. The first principle of Utilitarianism would consider this to be wrong, as an alternative would better benefit the
Smoking and secondhand smoke are major problems that many people are badly affected by. When getting exercise and playing outside turns into something harmful that is when it is time to draw the line. I think people should not be allowed to smoke in public areas or in the vicinity of others because it is harmful to their health, it is harmful to the smoker’s health, and it creates a negative image about the smoker.
smoking is socially rejected as a deviant act. smoking is something people see and learn as they grow up. cigerrette smokers are seen as deviant and he/she learns about this behavior most of the time by being around people who smoke weather its there parents, friends, family. A person who is surrounded by smokers is most likely going to start smoking. People most of the time start smoking cigarettes when they are young but they hide it. Many young people that hide to smoke and share the cigarettes with someone else making it seem fun. Once these people , accept it and join the deviant smokers they become deviant as well. A deviant smoker accepts and develops the identity of a deviant smoker. smoking is seen as wrong to alot of people,
Over the past years, the number of smokers has been on the rise. In today’s society, they are given the tools to be aware of harmful it can be, yet they still chose to do it. Smoking is a force of habit, it is a choice a person makes either to participate or not but it becomes outrageously addictive. The person choosing to smoke may not realize that they are not just harming themselves but they are also harming the ones surrounded by them. It has a negative effect on the people around the smoker because when the nicotine gets in the air it becomes hard to breathe and it travels amongst people faster than they realize. Smoking should be banned in all public places due to the bad influences, healthier lifestyles, and negative effect on
Most of the time non-smokers happen to be at places where people are allowed to smoke publicly, one will agree that the habit is irritating. Many different states in the United States and the world as a whole have drafted laws to control the habit of public smoking (Dugan, 2013). Some countries or states have gone ahead to ban smoking in public entirely. The move to ban smoking in public is a prudent one, because it will help save countless lives. The reasons behind the prohibition on smoking in public are that the habit affects non-smokers as well as put their lives in danger and this is equal to effects that smoking has on the active smoker.
Is breathing secondhand smoke in public irritating? Smoking has increased over the years and is an addictive habit. In the United States there are over more than 480,000 deaths from cigarette smoking each year. It isn’t just affecting the person smoking the cigarette, but also the people around them. Exposure to secondhand smoke irritates the airways and has immediate harmful effects on a person’s heart and blood vessels. When people are smoking in public, it travels through the air to people around them. Smoking is a personal choice and people can choose to smoke, but others don’t want the health risks that come from inhaling secondhand smoke. A person has their rights to breathe fresh and clean air, and along with that their right to maintain a healthy lifestyle without breathing in secondhand smoke. Smoking in public places should be banned because it produces second hand smoke, affects improving public health, and it can set a bad example for children.
“One thousand Americans stop smoking every day - by dying.”(The Quote Garden). It’s no surprise that smoking is one of the leading causes of death in the nation. There is overwhelming evidence that smoking affects our health. However, when one lights up a cigarette and smokes where other are present, one not only affects his or her own body, but others as well. This refers not only to the inconvenience of someone smoking near you, but also to the affect of secondhand smoke. Secondhand smoke has to ability to affect ones health, even if they never touch a cigarette! This poses the question whether or not smoking in public places should be legal.
Whether or not most people realise, the question of banning cigarette smoking in the workplace balances on a blade that could sever a noose tied around the necks of 20,000, or sever a major artery keeping society operating. Whether you believe smoking bans are a slippery slope to a nanny state or the first priority to preventing needless deaths, there are important things to know about both sides of the argument.
Individuals have different personalities, habits, beliefs and social concepts. People carry these traits into an organizational setting while conforming to the rules and regulations established by the organization. Certain personal habits such as smoking, or religious beliefs such as taking time to pray at work may cause conflict in the workplace if such practices are in the minority. In the past, cigarette smoking was a fashionable habit; however, in the US Surgeon General declared in 1964, that smoking is hazardous to ones health (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2006).
Smoking is known to be one of the most dangerous medicine and can come with some seriously negative to one’s lungs. Research studies have shown that second- hand smoking can be equally as bad. According to the 1964 Surgeon General’s Report, “2.5 million adults who were nonsmokers died because they breathed secondhand smoke” (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). To those who own restaurants, oversee public places, and others in charge of entertainment venues, pay special attention to the content in this paper. Smoking should be banned inside public restaurants and businesses as well as outside public parks and other places. It is important that people understand the damaging negative effects of smoking in public. My opponents might argue that smoking is only inhaled by the smoker himself, rather than others around him or her. However, as said before, second hand smoking is just as dangerous to the smoker and the people around. People need to understand that smoking can trigger others’ asthma and cause them to have an attack. Some argue that if businesses had signs outside their building saying that the venue is a smoking environment, than this would dismiss the asthma problem. However, even if businesses did display signs outside the buildings, this may drive customers away, resulting in failure of the businesses. Second hand smoking is dangerous, banning smoking in public places will reduce litter from
If you do not smoke cigarettes do you expect to get the same effects as someone who does? Anyone passing by a smoker may gain the same harmful effects without even knowing it. Public smoking should be prohibited because it can affect children's health, cause heart disease among adults and early deaths.
Ever since earlier years, when cigarettes came into the market, people have had the right to make a decision of whether or not they want to smoke, but for some people, this is not a choice. This creates the problem of second-hand smoke, which is more harmful than people think. What is worse is that people who inhale second-hand smoke are doing so without consent.Therefore smoking in any public place should be banned.Second-hand smoke is just as harmful as smoking and leads to a higher prevalence of cancer and heart disease.
Even though this is a topic that is constantly brought up. It is also a topic that stands out to myself greatly. Being raised in a family of smokers, I first-hand know the negatives of smoking and the tragedies that it can bring. Not only does it affect the user. It truly effects those around him or her. I cannot stress this enough. At the age of six, I had lost my grandfather to lung cancer. Even though I was at such a young age, I still vividly remember the pain that my grandfather was experiencing while he was in the hospital. Every time I heard him cough, my heart would sink. From hearing his cough, one would be able to tell that his lungs were poor and were badly damaged. My grandfather would have to muster all of his strength in order to let out one wheezing cough. He was a smoker for over
People have strong feelings concerning smoking in public places. Whether you are in favor of or in opposition to it, smoking in public places is a serious concern that need be addressed. I agree that it is unjust for smokers not to be allowed to smoke where they choose, but it is even more unreasonable for non smokers to be subjected to breathing in the exhaled smoke form someone else(passive smoking). Not to mention second-hand smoke is actually worse for someone than smoking itself. Along with the dangers second-hand smoke presents to the adults, think about what it does not only to your children but other children around you. Smokers may argue that non smokers can just as easily walk away as a smoker