preview

Gang Deviant Behavior

Decent Essays

America’s cities have experienced a substantial increase of gang membership among the youth living in impoverished communities throughout the last thirty years. Prior to 1990, many individuals associated gang activity with specific communities, but as youth gang violence was drastically increased across the United States’ inner cities, the public’s perception of this emerging social issue shifted. Due to the rapid rise of gang violence and the rise of youth membership, delinquent behavior by youths began to receive a substantial amount of academic and media attention. Gangs have been perceived by the media as groups of individuals who congregate regularly to commit crimes to profit their organizations. In 1973, 17 percent of the estimated …show more content…

Adolescents who join criminal gangs are often continuously exposed to violence, drugs, and other negative behavior because they reside in socially disorganized neighborhoods. Individuals who reside in crime prone areas are more likely to become delinquents. In addition, many youths learn deviant behavior from their peers who engage in criminal activities. According to Miller’s (1992) estimation, in1982, there were about 760 gangs within the cities of New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Detroit, Philadelphia, and San Francisco. Miller (1992) notes that these criminal organizations recruited youths which caused more gang activity within the public school system. Furthermore, gangs that had a large membership of deviant youth were more likely to use gun-violence towards rival gangs than other gangs with older active members (Miller, …show more content…

Various researchers have focused on simply just evaluating the impact these programs have on its participants and if they have been implemented as planned by the relevant stakeholders. For example, the purpose of Esbesen and Osgood (1999) national evaluation of the GREAT program is to compare between students who participated in the intervention to those who did not take part in the 13 lessons offered by GREAT. Additionally, Reddy and Goldstein (2001) conduct a program evaluation on the program ART, but their sample is only made up by sixty adolescent males and cannot be generalizable to the United States

Get Access