Many years ago I entered to work with an important governmental county department. During that time there was much tension since there were changing the computer program that used DOS. I could perceive the distress, apprehension, and struggle of many employees, especially those who used the old system for most part of their time in their jobs. Furthermore, a few employees try to persuade me to leave that place since it was chaotic since the change. The organization was constantly providing training for the new program. Furthermore, they allowed employees to take the manual home. Despite of the change, there were very few tasks that still need the use of the old system. To be honest, the new implemented system was faster, more efficient, and provided shortcuts that the older system did not offered. What is more, more clients could be attended. …show more content…
Although employees have their unique differences regarding resisting change in the workplace, researchers have identified some macro-factors that affect change in an organization. At an individual level some core factors that may influence change are self-esteem, level of optimism, and perceived control. At an organizational level, insufficient information, lack of participation in the process, social support, and personal impact of change figure among the elements that may hinder change in the workplace (Wanberg & Banas, 2000). In studies conducted by Taylor and Brown (1988) results showed that although change is distressful, openness to change was found to be associated with high levels of self-esteem, optimism, and perceived control. They argue that individuals with these features attempt to see change in the best light
As a result, Zwick (2002, p. 542) has noted that implementing change programmes in organisations that realise positive outcomes remain problematic for many organisations in the 21st century. Ayodeji & Oyesola (2011, p. 235) have postulated that organisational change is a dynamic process, which when taken poorly contribute to employee resistance to it, and eventually leads to failure of the whole process. 3|Page Organisation Behaviour; MGTS 1601; Individual Essay; Employee resistance to change Yuanli Zhang 43401163 Employees resist changes when they occur in the organisations for several reasons. Many organisations when they introduce changes are likely to stick to the ‘top-down organisational change’ process (Awasthy, Chandrasekaran & Gupta, 2011, pp.
Many people may resist change because they fear they will lose their jobs, status or position. It may be because they do not fully understand the purpose of change, or they may have a different perspective on the change than their management. “Individuals, groups, and organizations must be motivated to change. But if people perceive no performance gap or if they consider the gap unimportant, they will not have this motivation. Moreover, they will resist changes that others try to introduce,” Bateman and Zeithaml explained. Many times change for people at work
This article discusses the pros and cons of advocating change within the workplace. It also discusses the reason (s) individuals are said to resist change because of habit and inertia, fear of the unknown, absence of the skills they will need after the change, and fear of losing power. OD approaches to organizational change pr
Changing isn’t always the easiest thing to do, but in writing it is necessary. Whether it’s changing your genre; which includes style, form, focus, tone, word choice. Or changing it to fit a new workplace which is explained in Wardle's essay Identity, Authority, and Learning to Write in New Workplaces. Roozens Tracing Trajectories of Practice: Repurposing in One Student’s Developing Disciplinary Writing Process is also an example of how change affects someone's writing. Change is crucial for people in any new or different environment.
Assess the political climate aids in gauging the potential for resistance by examining the reasons for the present situation. Who is in control and who may be benefiting now? The manager also needs to focus on the cost benefit and access the resources to help create a successful plan.
People tend to oppose change, despite that the change is beneficial and will result in improvements for those affected. Staff resistance to change creates hindrances for those in managerial positions. Resistance to change is inevitable. Management must respond to it in an adept manner so it does not accelerate further into a severe problem. To effectively manage resistance to change, a manager must understand why the employee‘s initial reaction was to reject the proposal before it accelerates further and causes subpar job performance (Baker, 1989). Often time when a staff resists change, he or she is resisting coercion rather than change itself. Providing information is the most powerful approach a manager can take to assuage anxiety related to change. A manager can alleviate any fear of change by answering questions, acknowledging
Change is particularly difficult if it is unexpected. It is far easier to accept change if an employee has time to digest the news and prepare to take action once the change has occur. Some of the concerns that worry employees may be address by creating clear goals and timelines that employee can easily follow. As well as addressing the chief objective “why are we changing?” Once these questions have been answer and employees buy in to them change will be easier and resistance will diminish (Strebel, 1996).
Organizational change is not easy, but is an integral component that often allows the company and its employees to be prosperous. There are many ways to approach organizational change. Some are scientific theories like those stated in Organizational Behavior and Management (John Ivancevich) while others like John P. Kotter in “The Heart of Change,” believe it is just getting to the heart of your employees. If an organization today wants to be successful, they must understand why change is resisted and determine how to create a process to overcome this resistance
The purpose of this paper is to discuss organizational change and the management of that change. I will talk about the different drivers of change, the factors a leader needs to weigh to implement change effectively, the various resistances a leader may encounter while trying to implement change, and how various leadership styles will effect the realization of change. I will also discuss the knowledge I have gained through the completion of this assignment and how I think it might affect the way I manage change in my workplace.
When someone or something suggests making different in form, to transform, and to replace or substitute; I can only think of change. Change is all around us and has become a way of life. Understanding the reasons behind the change, for me is the key to managing change. As I reflect over some of the activities of my quick skills text of managing change. I can now see that it has brought me full circle from understanding change, to reacting to change, developing a positive attitude toward change, to anticipate change, to creating change, and keeping
Individuals when faced with any major change will be inevitably resistant and will want to preserve the status quo, especially if they think their status or security within the organization is in danger (Bolognese, 2010). Folger and Skarlicki believe that organizational change produces skepticism in employees which make it problematic and possibly even impossible to contrive improvements within the organization (as cited in Bolognese, 2010) Therefore, management must understand, accept and make an effort to work with resistance, since it can undermine even the most well-conceived change efforts (Bolognese, 2010). Furthermore, Coetsee states for organizations to achieve the maximum benefits from change they must effectively create and
Breakings through the chains of corporate slavery is in full affect. In other words, nobody wants to work for a heartless corporation that does not value their staff. Individuals are educated and ready to make a career change if necessary. The overwhelming feeling of being imprisoned by a job is dreadful. Even the most loyal captive will seek an opportunity to break free from a dreadful organization. The sensation of being confined within an organization with no room to grow or expand is a daunting feeling. When individuals are treated as if they do not matter, it raises the question; why stay here? If employers are naïve enough to think that there are no other options for hard working people, they are wrong. The information being
Bolognese, A. (2002). Employee Resistance to Organizational Change. Retrieved December 2, 2006 from Internet, http://www.newfoundations.com/OrgTheory/
Since human beings are adaptive and familiar with change, how is it that they often resist change in their work environment? This question had troubled managers since the beginning of the industrial revolution, and the fast peace of change required by the electronic age has made
To identify the key elements of the resistanceto change described in this situation, one may make use of the six Change Approaches of Kotter and Schlesinger.[1]The model prevents, minimizes or descreases resistance to change in organizations. According to Kotter and Schlesinger (1979), there are four reasons that why people resist change, three of which are applicable to this case: