preview

Critical Thinking Model

Decent Essays

In life, we are often capable of much more than we ever know. Our bodies and minds will automatically choose the path of least résistance, but when we have the right amount of motivation and encouragement, we can surpass any roadblock. The Module Two introductory video discussed the 33%-33%-33% principle. Thirty-three percent of people will simply disagree with the on decisions being made. Another thirty-three percent will agree, and the last thirty-three percent will not care. In order to shift mindsets, create buy-in, and trust the decision-maker’s intentions, it is imperative that he or she is organized, thoughtful, and caring during the decision-making process. This case study presents a problem regarding lack of student growth and …show more content…

Slide set two discussed the normative model. This would help this administrator identify, analyze, and develop solutions to the issue of a mediocre scope and sequence chart. A Garbage Can model will simply not do. Teachers need to understand the problem before taking action. Everything we do in education must be purposeful. Therefore, an effective leader must be able to communicate the issues and solutions with clarity and precision. In slide set three, advice was given stating, “Anything worth making a decision over is worth time, effort, and commitment.” This is an adaptive problem that will require time, thought, input, and empowerment of both the faculty and …show more content…

In the article, “Who Decides What,” the principal reminded readers about the importance of clarification necessary about the amount of autonomy given to teachers. In this case, there needs to be an expectation that rigor must increase in the scope and sequence. MindTools.com published an article entitle, “The Vroom-Yetton-Jago Decision Model.” In the article, the author wrote that one shouldn’t make autocratic decisions when team acceptance is crucial for a successful outcome. Therefore, the administrator should not be so authoritative that he or she shuts down any potential for change. As chapter six states in Practicing the Art of Leadership, one way to motivate facility is through fair process. Changing instruction and achievement expectations is naturally going to be a participatory effort. The Team Decision Making Inventory #7 noted the advantage of authority rule with discussion. It gains commitment from all team members, develops a lively discussion on the issues using the skills and knowledge of all team members, and is clear on who is accountable for the decisions of the team. This is ultimately what needs to happen in this case study situation. It will take a group effort to initiate change, and decision-making should include the people who the decisions are directly

Get Access