Buying An Outdoor Smoker Industry

Based on the table, the largest changes in NPV are due to changes in the annual cost savings. On the surface, the NPV is more sensitive to changes in cost savings than the initial investment based on the assumed range of changes. In fairness, the variation in annual cash flows of 40% is over two times larger than the variation allowed for in the initial investments (15%). A more meaningful comparison could be obtained by adjusting the two factors

2. Net Present Value – Secondly, Peter needs to investigate the Net Present Value (NPV) of each project scenario, i.e. job type, gross margin, and # new diamonds drills purchased. The NPV will measure the variance of the present value of cash outflow (drilling equipment investment) versus the future value of cash inflows (future profits), at the benchmark hurdle rate of 20%. A positive NPV associated with the investment means that the investment should be undertaken as it exceeds the minimum rate of return. A higher NPV determines which project scenario will have the highest return on cash flow, hence determining the most profitable investment in terms of present money value.

Evaluating the risks, calculating the probability of success, and factoring in the projected profit from sales will provide a clearer NPV to be compared with other projects in the

By using the 7.2% after tax rate and assuming the equipment will be sold at the beginning of the 5th year for its book value, if Agro-Chem bought the equipment the company would achieve a project NPV of ($1,043,500.23). In contrast, if Agro-Chem decided to lease the equipment with the same assumptions they would obtain a project NPV of ($1,030,205). Given these assumptions and based off our calculated NPV we recommend that Agro-Chem lease the equipment rather than buy because of the $13,295.23 savings. This $13,295.23 savings is the NAL.

a) In the first set of calculations, the staff used a discount rate of 20%, a five-year time horizon, and ignored taxes and terminal value. What is the relative attractiveness of these three alternatives?

Commercial’s NPV is $.1516 million (see Table 3). This was determined by using the present values of the four year lease agreement between Prudent and Commercial. We concluded that Commercial’s discount rate will be 10% because of their opportunity cost. Commercial needs to have a residual value on the DAS of 6.8 million or greater, which will give them a positive net present value. Therefore, if their net present value shows negative, they would not want to lease to us. Assuming Commercial receives the same 5 year MACRS rate on the equipment purchase, then the system should be worth 7.01 million (book value) at the end of year 4 (see Table 4). This allows Commercial to have a positive NPV of $.1516 million (see Table 4). Therefore, they would be willing to lease the DAS to us.

​Lincoln Sports is considering introducing a new cleat. They want ensure the outcome of the project on whether they should accept the project or reject it. They are using the expected net present value E(NPV) to make the decision. We use E(NPV) as a guideline, if it is positive then we can accept the project , but on the other hand if it is negative then we must reject the project.

Investments are necessary for a business to grow. Although, this is true it much more valuable to know about the value and benefit of the investment. Selecting the best investment choice will ensure growth in the future and will generate value. The problem typically arises when trying to utilize capital budgeting skills in determining different tasks with the same risk. There are many ways to determine the correct return gained from investments. The (NPV) Net Present Value has proven to be the best method for organizations to use. NPV gives a direct image of what can be profited or loss when investing. This allows for the best decision to be made when selecting a project.

Net Present Value (NPV) calculates the sum of discounted future cash flows and subtracting that amount with the initial investment of the project. If the NPV of a project results in a positive number, the project should be undertaken. It is the most widely used method of capital budgeting. While discount rate used in NPV is typically the organization’s WACC, higher risk projects would not be factored in into the calculation. In this case, higher discount rate should be used. An example of this is when the project to be undertaken happens to be an international project where the country risk is high. Therefore, NPV is usually used to determine if a project will add value to the company. Another disadvantage of NPV method is that it is fairly complex compared to the other methods discussed earlier.

In order to determine which of the two projects create more value, we must calculate NPV based on the assumptions relevant to the decision. The table below shows the NPV for the two product lines given discount rates of 7.7% (low risk), 8.4% (medium risk), and 9.0% (high risk). The Match My Doll Clothing line is currently rated as a medium risk project with 8.4% cost of capital. Given Emily’s knowledge of the industry we may be able to accept this; however, the firm should also consider whether children’s clothing lies within their core competencies and how different the market is from their current market for dolls. These factors

3. The NPV method is better because it shows the size of the project so you can see how much value a project has not just a percentage. You could have a higher percentage but a much lower value and you would still go for the lower percentage.

There are several traditional methods that can be used in appraising investment decisions. For instance, the net present value method (NPV) which entails estimating the costs and revenues of a project and discounting these figures to get their present values. Projects with the biggest positive net present value are the ones chosen as they represent the best stream of benefits of investing in the project over and above recovering the cost of initiating the projects. The discount rate is another method which is similar to the net present value method but reflects more on the time preference. This approach may focus on the opportunity cost of

Rainbow Products is considering the purchase of a paint-mixing machine to reduce labor costs.The savings are expected to result in additional cash flows to Rainbow of $5,000 per year. Themachine costs $35,000 and is expected to last for 15 years. Rainbow has determined that the cost ofcapital for such an investment is 12%.[A] Compute the payback, net present value (NPV), and internal rate of return (IRR) for this machine.Should Rainbow purchase it? Assume that all cash flows (except the initial purchase) occur at the endof the year, and do not consider taxes. Rainbow Products is considering the purchase of a paint-mixing machine to reduce labor costs.The savings are expected to result in additional cash flows to Rainbow of $5,000 per

The analysis for this project was done two separate ways. First, the net present value of the project as a whole was found, and second, the net present value for both projects individually was calculated. For the project taken as a whole, the net present value was $–23,353.81. This means there would be a negative return if the diesel boat were chosen. Also, for the projects taken individually, choosing to rehabilitate the Conway had a net present value of $17,210.35, while the choosing the diesel had a net present value of $-269,677.98, which also shows that rehabilitating the Conway is the better choice because it brings in a positive return while the diesel boat would not.

This analysis will determine whether or not the project is worth pursuing using a net present value (NPV) approach.