Boston Tea Party

Back in the 1700’s the British Parliament had to start taxing the colonies to pay for war debt from the treaty of paris, this made the colonists furious, for they did not know why they had to pay, they thought this was underhanded, this caused breakout wars between Britain and America.

"The distinctions between Virginians, Pennsylvanians, New Yorkers, and New Englanders are no more. I Am Not A Virginian, But An American!" (Patrick Henry in 1774 after the Boston Tea Party.) American colonists gave everything for independence. While independence did not come immediately, many events triggered the Revolutionary war and eventual forming of the Nation we call home. Colonists banded together through oppression and tyranny caused by the British. Prior to the Boston Tea Party, the colonists quietly adhered to Britain's rules and taxations. Over time, angst and anger built up which erupted into the iconic Boston Tea Party. Men came together as brothers in the light of independence and nationalism for their country. The Boston Tea

The Boston tea party was assembled by the Sons of Liberty on Thursday December 16th 1773 around 7:00 to 10:00 PM put on in front of a crowd of over 5,000 people this was an act of defiance of the Americas to Britain to the Tea Act of 1773, as well as taxation without representation or more well known as the Townshend Act of 1767. However it was just not these two factors which lead them to do this it was also the thought of Britain charging the colonists more for tea, ink, and many other things, in order to pay for the troops fighting in the French and Indian War. So at first Britain was making everyone pay over price on tea so the colonists started smuggling tea from Dutch and other European tea makers. These things violated

The Boston Tea Party was one of the first acts of defiance by the American Colonists against Great Britain. It was also an event that led to the independence of America. The Tea Party took place in the winter of December 16, 1773 in Boston, Massachusetts. In this event, American settlers did not want to pay the raising taxes of tea and other goods to the British Parliament, which led to the colonists sneaking on boats dressed as Native Americans, where they dumped 342 chests of tea into the Boston Harbor. The Boston Tea Party was an act of terrorism under the Patriot Act because: they conspired to dump the tea into the harbor, attempted, and succeeded in dumping the tea into the harbor, and had the intent of committing a crime by carrying

Tea is for those against Liberty The Boston Tea Party was ultimately an American act defying taxation. The British Parliament’s Tea Act of 1773 inhibited the colonists from paying normal prices for not only tea, but also stamps and sugar. Both sides, the British and the colonists, were affected in paramount effect. The colonists didn’t feel that they deserved the unjust taxes placed upon them while the British had a major debt after the war that they attempted to diminish. The combination of these two sides resulted in a dismantling aftermath.

This quote by Thomas Jefferson was one of his very famous quotes. Because of what Mr. Jefferson said it showed the colonists that they could control the government. This fueled many rebellious acts, as the acts showed the government that the colonists were going to do anything to gain freedom. The Sons of Liberty were a very important, all patriot group that would do anything for freedom. One of the Sons of Liberty 's greatest protest was the Boston Tea Party. This act showed the government that they would do anything, even dump $1,700,000 worth of tea into the harbor for freedom. As a result of the Boston Tea Party the Coercive or Intolerable Acts were passed. These acts were to punish the colonies for their rebellious behavior and stop more of these protests.

Due to disagreements with the taxes on tea from the Townsend Acts, Sam Adams lead a group of protestors to dump tea from a ship in the Boston harbor. As Jack Rakove says in his book, Revolutionaries, “Had the value of the tea not been so dear, the Boston Tea Party might be remembered, if at all, as a minor piece of political theater” (Rakove 30). The British were dealing with debt from the seven years’ war and saw this attack on their property a direct insult to their sovereignty. Unlike many Loyalist, the Patriots supported and respected the attack, as can be seen in an article by the Boston Gazette, where they say, “A number of brave & resolute men, determined to do all in their power to save their country from the ruin which their enemies

The Boston Tea Party was a protest of Massachusetts colonists that were masked or disguised as Mohawks in 1733. The Boston Tea Party was led by Samuel Adams who was against the Tea Act and was also against taxing. The Tea Act was passed by the British Parliament, it was actually the duty to export tea overboard. The British Parliament didn’t like how they tipped 342 crates of tea into the Boston harbor and that’s what happened in the Boston Tea

Night, The colonist were disguised as indians dumping the tons of tea. This act was to to help with financial problems.

The term terrorism is used widely in present day especially in the United States. Terrorism is a double standard, the people who commit those terrorist acts, commit the acts out of beliefs and in their eyes ok. Terrorism can be described as the illegitimate use of force to achieve a political objective by targeting innocent people (Laqueur, 1987). To me the definition mention above is a great definition to describe terrorism as a crime. To aim for innocent people to prove a point which lead major injuries or death in most cases is to most people would be a crime, no questions asked. According to Martha Crenshaw (1995), “Terrorism cannot be defined unless the act, target and possibility of success are analyzed”. So to think, terrorist are people who commit these acts as a way to get their political or religious point across. If we look at the some of the most famous terrorist acts they are automatically labeled crimes. 9/11 was a crime because the persons affiliated with the act, targeted the

Bob is a person who was walking down the hallway. When he arrives at history class, he completely zones out when the teacher talks about the Boston Tea Party. He panicked when he was doing his homework, realizing that he did not understand anything. Fortunately he read articles like this one to help him learn what he missed. The Dumping of Tea or the Boston Tea Party was an event in Boston, Massachusetts that helped spark the American Revolution.

As defined by the Federal Bureau of Investigations, acts of terrorism can fit into one of two ways, domestic terrorism and international terrorism (FBI.gov). Although, there are two types, overall the FBI defines terrorism in general as a violent act intended to manipulate the civilian body, the government, and/or to involve putting people in danger on a federal or state level (FBI.gov). Meaning that someone (organization, government, institution, etc.) violently attacks someone else (government,

If one were to ask a cross-section of individuals to define what terrorism means, there would ultimately be multiple definitions similar in many aspects but not able to be unified to create a single definition. Terrorism is a

For the most part, the authors’ methodology revolved around the grassroots level. Fieldwork observations and interviews among different Tea Party sectors in the country were supplemented with data of the demographic and attitudes of Tea Party activists and sympathizers from national surveys, data of national funding and support organizations, and information on the involvement and philosophy from various local and regional Tea Party websites. The personal interviews from average citizens active in their local Tea Party provided knowledge on the basis of the growth and issues of most interest on the grassroots level. The authors depict a sweet image of normal families with the sincerity and determination in leading the charge. Though the involvement

The concept of terrorism as defined by Hoffman in his book, Inside Terrorism, is not easily defined. Hoffman indicates that most definitions do not give the word “terrorism” a clear definition for today (Hoffman 2006). However, according to Hoffman, the Oxford English Dictionary does provide a definition that embodies terrorism since its beginnings. “Any one who attempts to further his views by a system of coercive intimidation.” (Hoffman 2006, 3). The views that are typically political or idealogical in nature (Hoffman, 2006, 2-3).