Discussion 8

.docx

School

Suffolk County Community College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

104

Subject

Political Science

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by PresidentResolveMagpie3 on coursehero.com

1. How was the language of freedom used to justify American foreign policy in the early Cold War? During the Cold War, the Soviet Union wanted to spread communist ideology in China, Vietnam, and Europe. USA wanted to spread ideas of Democracy. Both countries were against each other, and the USA followed the policy of containment. Through this policy, the USA wanted to confine the USSR so that it could also spread its American market. The USA tried to boost of German and Japanese economies. NATO also came into existence.  The Soviet Union kept the view that human freedom should be viewed in a collective and public manner. They were against the freedom of individuals. Social and community freedom was more important for the Soviet Union. USA called this half freedom, and they brought the concept of "half free" and "half slave". The USA stressed that communist ideology would restrict freedom. They projected themselves as a medium through which everyone could live freely. They objected to the USSR with all their efforts and convinced most of the world to be on their side.  2. What were the consequences of viewing the Cold War in such narrow terms as "free" and "slave"? The consequences of viewing the Cold War in such narrow terms as "free" and "slave" led to a binary and polarized perspective, overlooking the complexities of global geopolitics. This oversimplified view hindered nuanced understanding and diplomacy, fostering an "us versus them" mentality. It obscured regional conflicts, contributing to misguided interventions. Moreover, it marginalized non-aligned nations, limiting diplomatic possibilities. In essence, the narrow framing of the Cold War in ideological terms hampered nuanced analysis and hindered the development of more cooperative and inclusive international relations. 3. What was the core principle of the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights? The core principle of the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights is the recognition and affirmation of the inherent dignity and equal rights of all individuals. Adopted in 1948, the declaration emphasizes fundamental human freedoms, including the right to life, liberty, and security. It prohibits discrimination and torture while promoting social and economic
rights. Serving as a global standard, the declaration aims to protect and promote human rights universally, irrespective of nationality, ethnicity, or other distinctions. 4. Analyze Truman's Fair Deal. In what way(s) was it an extension of the New Deal? Truman's Fair Deal, proposed in 1949, aimed to build upon Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal policies. Like its predecessor, the Fair Deal sought to address economic and social inequalities. It proposed measures such as national health insurance, increased minimum wage, and expanded social security. The Fair Deal mirrored the New Deal's commitment to government intervention in the economy to promote social welfare. Both initiatives shared a common goal of using governmental policies to mitigate economic hardships and foster a more equitable society, illustrating a continuity in the approach to addressing societal challenges. 5. In what ways did the Cold War shape American immigration policy? The Cold War significantly influenced American immigration policy by intertwining national security concerns with migration. The U.S. sought to bolster its image as a beacon of freedom against the Soviet Union's repression, leading to the admission of refugees and displaced persons. The 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, a product of Cold War anxieties, maintained quotas but allowed for more inclusive criteria. The ideological struggle also prompted the acceptance of skilled immigrants to showcase technological prowess. Thus, the Cold War era molded immigration policies, reflecting strategic geopolitical considerations and the ideological competition between superpowers.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help