Human Rights Lesson 9

.docx

School

Plumpton College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

238

Subject

Law

Date

Apr 30, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by DrField13996 on coursehero.com

Human Rights Lesson 9: The Incorporation of Human Rights into Domestic Law Video Notes: Domestic laws: make international rights more enforceable Process of incorporating rights: Step 1 = international treaty (Difficult to enforce as an individual) Step 2 = State signing treaty (Not enforceable in domestic law) Step 3 = Ratifying a treaty (Enforceable in the high court) Step 4 = Legislation (enforceable in domestic law) Ratifying = where the gov commits to putting right in law Activity 2: 1. Research: What is the difference between a monist and dualist legal system? Identify which of these Australia is. A dualist system treats the international and domestic systems of law as separate and independent. Monist systems = when the country’s government ratifies a treaty, the treaty automatically becomes law in the country as if it were an act of parliament. 2. Describe the sources from where Australia derives its protection of Human Rights International treaties Australian constitution Common law Statute law of the commonwealth, states and territories Activity 3: Complete the following Case Study demonstrating this in action: Toonen vs Australia Activity Questions: Identify the complainant, the date of the original submission and the date of the Committee’s meeting. Summarise the facts of the complaint. What was the issue, who was the complaint against and what were the circumstances of the complaint? Explain why the complainant took the complaint to the Human Rights Committee. Under what international treaty and by what process was the complaint brought? Briefly explain the main arguments of the complainant against the state party. The compliant maintained that Tasmanian law discriminated against men based on their sexual activity and orientation and that they were unequal before the law. Briefly explain the arguments of the state party in defence. Domestic laws are reasonable for interfering with the right to privacy. The laws help protect against the spread of HIV and therefore are justified on public health grounds. Also, the laws help uphold the moral fabric of society.
Explain the outcome and briefly explain the reasoning of the Committee in reaching its decision. The human rights committee found that Tasmanian laws interfered with the human right to privacy and ordered Australia to repeal the incompatible rule. The law violated article 17 of the ICCPR without any reasonable justification for that violation Using the information in Cambridge Legal Studies — Year 12, explain the consequences of the decision and the events that followed. Tasmanian government refused to repeal the law. The Australian government enacted the Human rights (sexual conduct) Act 1994 (Cth). However, Tasmania still refused to repeal their law. Therefore, Tasmania was taken to high court and the high court deemed the law illegal. In light of the processes and the outcome that you have analysed above, critically evaluate the effectiveness of international human rights instruments and the international legal system in influencing change in human rights around the world. International human rights instruments such as treaties and declarations are effective at defining a benchmark for human rights and having an educative effective on the human rights all people are entitled to.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help