Module 3 Preparation

.pdf

School

University of Missouri, St. Louis *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

2430

Subject

Accounting

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

6

Uploaded by MajorDragonflyMaster1068 on coursehero.com

Questions: 1. From Chapter 4, p. 83, question 20/21. Note that 21 is a continuation of 20. While performing an inventory count at a medical supply company, an auditor observed that waste from radioactive isotopes produced at that facility appeared to be leaking into the surrounding soil. The auditor was concerned that these leaks might affect the underground water supplied in the community. The company states in its annual audited report that it is a “model citizen, concerned with maintaining a safe workplace for its employees and a pristine environment for all citizens.” What should the auditor do, if anything? Basic Ethical Issue The basic ethical issue is being dishonest and untrustworthy about maintaining a safe workplace for employees and citizens. Key Facts Some of the key facts are that the auditor observed waste from radioactive isotopes produced at that facility appeared to be leaking into the surround soil and the company states in its annual audited report that it is a “model citizen, concerned with maintaining a safe workplace for its employees and a pristine environment for all citizens.” I included both of these because the auditor recognized and knew the company stated in the annual audited report to maintain a safe workplace. Possible Alternative Perspectives It is ethical to be dishonest and untrustworthy about maintaining a safe workplace for employees and citizens because from a shareholders perspective, they want profits and gains while the company wants to keep a positive image to the public. They don’t want to break that trust so if they choose to lie or hide that there’s waste leaking into the soil, this is actually a loss aversion effect. It is unethical to be dishonest and untrustworthy about maintaining a safe workplace for employees and citizens because the company has corporate social responsibility. They are socially accountable to itself, its stakeholders, and to the public. They want to keep a good image but they contradict themselves when the waste is leaking into the soil. Conclusion I believe that it was unethical to be dishonest and untrustworthy about maintaining a safe workplace for employees and citizens because it's not fair for everyone who is living near that company and to have the company disregard their environment. There would be
trust issues if this information got leaked out and there would be tension between the public and company. The auditor should report to the company that waste is leaking into the soil. If the company does do something to counter the problem, that's great. But if the company doesn’t do anything about it, I would quit the job because I don’t agree with what they’re doing. I would also report them to the authorities or whoever is in charge of waste management. 2. From Chapter 4, p. 84, question 29. In your role as an internal auditor for a car manufacturer, you discovered that your employer can produce a car engine that will get 8 more miles per gallon than the existing engine. However, the cost of producing this car engine would be an additional $3,000 per car. Assume that a typical driver drives a car for 5 years and 200,000 miles. Also, assume that the cost of a gallon of gas is $5 per gallon and a typical car gets 24 miles per gallon. The company is wondering if it is ethical to not produce this more efficient engine. Is this an ethical question or just a simple cost accounting problem? How would you analyze this from the perspective of shareholder theory? How would you analyze this from the perspective of stakeholder theory? If this car manufacturer does decide to produce the more fuel-efficient car, would you consider it to be an act of corporate social responsibility? Would your answer to the preceding question be different if the car manufacturer's motivation was simply to increase its profits by selling more cars? Basic Ethical Issue The basic ethical issue here is their fairness when the company could produce efficient car engines but chooses not to. Key Facts Some of the key facts are that it would cost $3,000 more per car for the company for a car engine that will get 8 more miles per gallon than the existing engine and the cost of a gallon of gas is $5 per gallon and a typical car gets 24 miles per gallon. A typical driver drives a car for 5 years and 200,000 miles. I included these three facts because it shows that the company could produce a better car engine that could benefit the consumer. It
weighs the benefits to society and the environment against the increased cost to the company and potential impact on profits. Possible Alternative Perspectives It is ethical to not be fair when producing a more efficient engine because from a shareholders theory perspective, the company has a duty to maximize the welfare of its stockholders. The shareholders want to gain profits off of the consumers. It is unethical to not be fair when producing a more efficient engine because from a Stakeholder theory perspective, the company should consider the interests of all stakeholders (customers, employees, the community, and the environment). They could be seen as having corporate social responsibility to produce a more fuel-efficient car engine and the company would be seen as taking a step towards reducing its environmental footprint. Conclusion I think it's unethical to not be fair when producing a more efficient engine because the consumers could get more of their car and greatly benefit them in the long run. I think it’s a little bit of an ethical and simple cost accounting problem. If the car manufacturer does decide to produce a more fuel-efficient car, I would consider it to be an act of corporate social responsibility because it benefits the environment and would create a positive image. My answer would be different if the car manufacturer's motivation was simply to increase its profits by selling more cars because that would be their goal and a lot of companies nowadays are for profit. 3. From Chapter 5, p. 108, question 11. All products for cleaning windows use a slightly acidic solution that contains ammonia. One of the well-known brands of glass cleaning products uses this same solution. To make it more appealing, it also contains a lemon scent and is yellow. You have decided to manufacture a glass cleaning product as well, which you call Citrus Sunshine. The product, when manufactured, is clear and odorless. Your product uses the standard acidic solution containing ammonia, and you have decided to add a lemon scent and yellow color.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help