Assignment 3 - Ethics Case

.docx

School

National University College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

435A

Subject

Accounting

Date

May 6, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

5

Uploaded by Babytay281 on coursehero.com

Assignment 3 – Ethics Case Crystal Estridge National University ACC 435A Auditing I Professor Monique Smalling March 24, 2024
Assignment 3 – Ethics Case 1 Introduction The CPA firm of Tower & Tower has a potential new client prospect from their new partner, Tammy Potters. This new client prospect, Lewis Edmonds, is considered a well-respected member of the community and his company, Tierra Corporation, is very committed, successful, and profitable that was well regarded by the company’s attorney and bank. During a new client investigation process Tammy was given information by the company’s prior accountant on fraud 10 years prior during an IRS audit. A large capital loss was in question for some land the company sold. Per the attorney, Edmonds denied knowing any of the purchaser’s information and the documents for the transaction were misplaced and not found. Further in the IRS investigation it came out the Trust the land was sold to be his own daughter and he was a trustee on this account, proving fraud which the IRS disallowed the loss and penalizing for it. After this concerning information, Tammy Potter believes Lewis Edmonds has learned his lesson and matured enough to not engage in further questionable activities. Now the question is, should Tower & Tower continue and accept an engagement with Lewis Edmond and his company Tierra Corporation or decline due to the high risk? Acceptance Argument To consider the acceptance of this client, additional investigation into the incident will need to be made to verify the exact details. This fraud occurred 10 years prior, and the situation involved selling land to his daughter’s trust. Most parents will sell land for less than what it is worth to assist their children. Lewis Edmonds is a well-respected member within the community and 10 years of no additional fraudulent occurrences
Assignment 3 – Ethics Case 2 shows he has matured to not engage in such activities again. The CPA firm shouldn’t decline a client for this prior fraud but consider building a more detailed audit program with their generalized audit software. “Alterations of the nature, timing, or extent of audit procedures to address a fraud risk may involve applying procedures that provide more reliable evidence, shifting tests from the interim period to near year-end, or increasing the sample size for a particular substantive procedure (234, Whittington, 2018).” This audit will be more complex and in depth but will be worth bringing on a well-respected member of the community with a successful business. Further growth of the company requires a risk to be taken. Decline Argument However, even though it was associated with family, the fraud still occurred when Lewis Edmonds recorded the loss in the business financials and then lied about the situation to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), who says he will not do it again? Due to this prior occurrence the client and company are already considered high-risk. With this audit being used for substantial additional financing this engagement is at an even higher risk because if there is another fraud occurrence not detected but found later it could jeopardize the integrity and reputation of the Tower & Tower CPA firm. Fraud is difficult to detect, especially when it involves upper management and/or CEO, the risk is to high to consider this engagement with Tierra Corporation and Lewis Edmonds. The IRS already has them flagged in their system for fraud, the firm shouldn’t have auditing association with this company.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help